PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 15, 2013Blood236 citations

Evolving risk of therapy-related acute myeloid leukemia following cancer chemotherapy among adults in the United States, 1975-2008

View Full Paper
LMLindsay M. MortonGDGraça M. DoresMTMargaret A. Tucker

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Therapy-related acute myeloid leukemia (tAML) is a rare but highly fatal complication of cytotoxic chemotherapy. Despite major changes in cancer treatment, data describing tAML risks over time are sparse. Among 426068 adults initially treated with chemotherapy for first primary malignancy (9 US population-based cancer registries, 1975-2008), we identified 801 tAML cases, 4.70 times more than expected in the general population (P < .001). Over time, tAML risks increased after chemotherapy for non-Hodgkin lymphoma (n = 158; Poisson regression Ptrend < .001), declined for ovarian cancer (n = 72; Ptrend < .001), myeloma (n = 62; Ptrend = .02), and possibly lung cancer (n = 65; Ptrend = .18), and were significantly heterogeneous for breast cancer (n = 223; Phomogeneity = .005) and Hodgkin lymphoma (n = 58; Phomogeneity = .007). tAML risks varied significantly by age at first cancer and latency and were nonsignificantly heightened with radiotherapy for lung, breast, and ovarian cancers. We identified newly emerging elevated tAML risks in patients treated with chemotherapy since 2000 for esophageal, cervical, prostate, and possibly anal cancers; and since the 1990s for bone/joint and endometrial cancers. Using long-term, population-based data, we observed significant variation in tAML risk with time, consistent with changing treatment practices and differential leukemogenicity of specific therapies. tAML risks should be weighed against the benefits of chemotherapy, particularly for new agents and new indications for standard agents.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Morton et al. (2013) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a09b5a5a9b5885644346320https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2012-08-448068
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1New avenues for second-line treatment of metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer2008 · 11 citations
  2. 2Risk of Leukemia Associated With the First Course of Cancer Treatment: An Analysis of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program Experience 21984 · 77 citations
  3. 3Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer — 30 Years Later2006 · 46 citations
  4. 4Risks of second primary cancer among patients with major histological types of lung cancers in both men and women2010 · 31 citations
  5. 5Conventional-Dose Chemotherapy Compared with High-Dose Chemotherapy plus Autologous Hematopoietic Stem-Cell Transplantation for Metastatic Breast Cancer2000 · 465 citations