Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
PURPOSE: We determined the impact of preexisting co-morbidities on survival of men with clinical stages T1b and T2NXM0 prostate cancer treated with surgery or radiation therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A weighted co-morbidity score was determined for 276 consecutive men treated with surgery (138) or radiation therapy (138) at a Veterans Affairs medical center and was correlated with actuarial freedom from death due to co-morbid disease. RESULTS: After a median potential followup of 7.0 years 91 patients (33%) died of co-morbid disease and 20 (7%) died of cancer related causes. There were highly significant correlations between actuarial survival and weighted co-morbidity (p < 0.000001), and the 10-year actuarial survivals in men with no or severe co-morbidities were 66 and 9%, respectively. Associations between patient age and co-morbidity score were highly significant (p < 0.0001). The age adjusted risk of co-morbid death was 5.7 times greater in men with severe compared to no co-morbidities. There were also significant correlations between actuarial survival and weighted co-morbidity among patients treated with surgery (p = 0.02) and radiation therapy (p = 0.0002). Patient age and severity of co-morbidities were significantly greater among men treated with radiation therapy compared to surgery, and age adjusted risk of co-morbid death among men with a co-morbidity score of 1 was 3.8 times greater among men treated with radiation therapy (p = 0.025). CONCLUSIONS: Cancer related deaths are unusual within 5 to 10 years after surgery or radiation therapy in men with stages T1b and 2 prostate cancer. The risk of death during this interval is directly related to the severity of co-morbid conditions, which should be factored in an individual when assessing the advisability of therapeutic intervention. Since patient co-morbidities impact all cause survival, quantitative assessment of co-morbidities using validated instruments offers a method to control partially for the variabilities of health status among men receiving different treatments for localized prostate cancer.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fowler et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: