PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 1, 2022Contemporary Security Policy158 citationsOpen Access

Why Russia attacked Ukraine: Strategic culture and radicalized narratives

View Full Paper
EGElias GötzJSJørgen Staun

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

This article explores Russia’s attack on Ukraine using the lens of strategic culture. Specifically, two strands in Russian strategic culture are identified. The first is a deep-seated sense of vulnerability, especially vis-à-vis “the West.” To counter this perceived threat, Russia’s national security establishment has long emphasized the importance of possessing strategic depth and buffer zones. The second strand revolves around a feeling of entitlement to great power status. A central component in Russia’s great power vision is the right to have a sphere of influence in its Eurasian neighborhood. The article shows that Kremlin officials perceived Ukraine’s drift toward the West as a major threat to both Russia’s security interests and its status aspirations. As a result, Russia’s rhetorical milieu regarding Ukraine became increasingly radicalized. The article concludes that this provided the discursive and intellectual habitat that enabled Putin to launch a large-scale attack.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Götz et al. (2022) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0a4c89a9576e6c7db4e84dhttps://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2022.2082633
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper