Key result
Preventing perioperative HF complications requires risk assessment, medical optimization, and hemodynamic monitoring.
This review outlines the pharmacological, non-pharmacological, and perioperative management of heart failure, emphasizing risk assessment based on etiology, symptoms, and surgical urgency.
Supports standard perioperative HF protocols; extends 2013 framework yet leaves open for contemporary validation.
In the elderly population, the most predominant etiology for hospitalization is heart failure (HF). The possibility of developing intraoperative and postoperative complications increases in patients with de novo HF or those who decompensate suddenly. Among the many classification systems described for HF, the 2013 American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association classification is the most commonly used. In this classification system, in accordance with the ejection fraction (EF), the HF is categorized into two types: First, those with reduced (≤40%) EF or systolic heart failure and second, those with preserved (≥50%) EF or diastolic heart failure. Plasma natriuretic peptide measurement and echocardiography constitute the diagnostic modalities of choice. Management of HF centers around a combination of diuretics, beta-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, arginine receptor neprilysin inhibitors, and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors. The emergence of newer, innovative therapies that are effective and well-tolerated, can potentially improve the outcomes of these patients. Perioperative risk assessment involves the awareness of the etiology of HF, the magnitude of symptoms of HF, concomitant cardiac or non-cardiac risk factors for morbidity/mortality, and the urgency and type of surgery. The review discusses the pharmacological, non-pharmacological, and perioperative management of HF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Singh et al. (2025) conducted a review in Heart Failure. Perioperative management of heart failure requires preoperative risk assessment, optimization of medical therapy, and careful intraoperative hemodynamic monitoring to minimize complications.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: