Why the study?
Patients with cancer have a higher incidence of AF, but management is complicated by drug interactions, patient fragility, under-validated risk scores, and underrepresentation in DOAC trials.
This review highlights the pathophysiological links between atrial fibrillation and cancer, and discusses the complex therapeutic challenges regarding rhythm control and anticoagulation in this fragile population.
Demands cautious individualized decisions on rhythm control and anticoagulation in cancer-associated AF; leaves open optimal strategies pending dedicated prospective trials.
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is an increasingly recognized comorbidity in patients with cancer. Indeed, cancer patients have a significantly higher incidence of AF than that observed in the general population. A reciprocal relationship between these two diseases has been observed, as much as some assume AF to be a marker for occult cancer screening, especially in older adults. The pathophysiological mechanisms are many and varied, including the underlying pro-inflammatory state, specific treatments (chemo- and radiotherapy), and surgery. The therapeutic management of patients with cancer and AF involves the same rhythm and frequency control strategies as the general population; however, the numerous interactions with chemotherapeutics, which lead to a significant increase in side effects, as well as the extreme fragility of the patient, should be considered. Anticoagulant therapy is also a complex challenge to address, as bleeding and stroke risk scores have not been fully assessed in this subpopulation. Furthermore, in large studies establishing the efficacy of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), cancer patients have been underrepresented. In this review, we elaborate on the mechanisms linking AF to cancer patients with a particular focus on the therapeutic challenges in this population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Luca et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: