Key result
R2CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥5 linked to ~138% greater risk of CIED complications versus scores <5.
Why the study?
The number of CIEDs is increasing globally, but whether CHA2DS2-VASc and R2CHA2DS2-VASc scores predict CIED-related complications remains to be investigated.
Does a high R2CHA2DS2-VASc score (≥ 5) predict increased complications in patients undergoing CIED surgery?
Observational (n=1,676)
Yes
Does a high R2CHA2DS2-VASc score (≥ 5) predict increased complications in patients undergoing CIED surgery?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The R2CHA2DS2-VASc score can be used to predict the risk of device-related infections and cumulative complications in patients undergoing CIED implantation.
Background Globally, the number of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) is increasing. In our study, we aimed to investigate whether CHA 2 DS 2 ‐VASc and R 2 CHA 2 DS 2 ‐VASc scores are predictive of CIED‐related complications. Methods Our investigation was carried out with a multicenter retrospective design. Patients who underwent CIED surgery at two cardiac centers in Turkey between January 2011 and May 2023, 1676, were evaluated. The patients were divided into two groups according to their R 2 CHA 2 DS 2 ‐VASc scores. Patients with R 2 CHA 2 DS 2 ‐VASc ≥ 5 were included in group 1 (380 patients), and patients with R 2 CHA 2 DS 2 ‐VASc < 5 (1296 patients) were included in group 2. The primary outcome was defined as the cumulative events. Each component of cumulative events, such as hematoma, pericardial effusion, pneumothorax, and infection, was also defined as a secondary outcome. Results The study's patient population had an average age of 62.9 ± 14 years. Pneumothorax (1.8% vs. 1.3%, p = 0.444), pericardial effusion or tamponade (0.35% vs. 0.2%, p = 0.659), and clinically significant hematoma (1.1% vs. 0.6%, p = 0.376) were comparable between the groups. Infection‐related devices and cumulative events classified as primary outcomes were higher in the R 2 CHA 2 DS 2 ‐VASc ≥ 5 group (6.1% vs. 1.2%, p < 0.001; 7.6% vs. 3.2%, p < 0.001, respectively). Modeling analyses showed that the CHA 2 DS 2 ‐VASc score and HT were also independent predictors of device‐related infection and cumulative events. Conclusion In the R 2 CHA 2 DS 2 ‐VASc ≥ 5 groups, infection related to the device system and cumulative events were higher. Patients with an R 2 CHA 2 DS 2 ‐VASc score of 5 or more and a high CHA 2 DS 2 ‐VASc score should be evaluated more carefully regarding infection and cumulative events before and after the operation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Söner et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Patients undergoing cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) surgery (n=1,676). R2CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥ 5 vs. R2CHA2DS2-VASc score < 5 was evaluated on Cumulative events (hematoma, pericardial effusion, pneumothorax, and infection) (p=<0.001). An R2CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥5 was associated with a higher rate of cumulative CIED-related complications compared to a score <5.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: