Key result
The R2CHA2DS2-VASc score outperformed the CHA2DS2-VASc score in predicting 4-year all-cause mortality (delta C-statistic 0.05; 95% CI 0.02-0.07).
Why the study?
Although CHA2DS2-VASc and R2CHA2DS2-VASc scores predict adverse outcomes in non-AF populations, their correlation with and comparative performance for predicting all-cause mortality in high cardiovascular risk patients needed evaluation.
Does the R2CHA2DS2-VASc score improve prediction of all-cause mortality compared to the CHA2DS2-VASc score in high cardiovascular risk patients?
Observational (n=1,017)
No
Does the R2CHA2DS2-VASc score improve prediction of all-cause mortality compared to the CHA2DS2-VASc score in high cardiovascular risk patients?
The R2CHA2DS2-VASc score, which incorporates renal impairment, provides superior prediction of 4-year all-cause mortality compared to the standard CHA2DS2-VASc score in high cardiovascular risk patients.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
R2CHA2DS2-VASc may refine mortality risk stratification in high-CV-risk patients; leaves open whether it improves outcomes over standard scores in prospective use.
Background The CHA 2 DS 2 ‐VASc score, widely used to estimate cardioembolic risk in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), appears to be useful also in predicting vascular adverse events and death in different sets of patients without AF. The R 2 CHA 2 DS 2 ‐VASc score, which includes renal impairment, allows a better prediction of death and thromboembolism in patients without AF. The aims of our study were to assess, in a large sample of patients at high cardiovascular (CV) risk, (i) the correlation between CHA 2 DS 2 ‐VASc and R 2 CHA 2 DS 2 ‐VASc with all‐cause mortality, and (ii) to compare the performances of CHA 2 DS 2 ‐VASc and R 2 CHA 2 DS 2 ‐VASc in predicting all‐cause mortality. Methods In this single‐centre prospective observational study, conducted at the Research Hospital ‘Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza’ between June 2016 and December 2018, 1017 CV patients at high risk of undergoing coronary angiography were enrolled. Results CHA₂DS₂‐VASc and R 2 CHA 2 DS 2 ‐VASc scores significantly associated with all‐cause mortality. For each one‐point increase in CHA 2 DS 2 ‐VASc or R 2 CHA 2 DS 2 ‐VASc scores, mortality increased by almost 1.5‐fold. The R 2 CHA 2 DS 2 ‐VASc score (C‐statistic = 0.71; 95% CI = 0.65–76) outperformed the CHA 2 DS 2 ‐VASc score (C‐statistic = 0.66; 95% CI = 0.61–0.71) in predicting 4‐year mortality (delta C‐statistic = 0.05; 95% CI = 0.02–0.07). The better predictive ability of the R‐CHA 2 DS 2 ‐VASc score was also demonstrated by an IDI = 0.027 (95% CI = 0.021–0.034, p < .00001) and a relative IDI = 62.8% (95% CI = 47.9%–81.3%, p < .00001). The R 2 CHA 2 DS 2 ‐VASc score correctly reclassified the patients with a NRI = 0.715 (95% = 0.544–0.940, p < .00001). Conclusions The CHA₂DS₂‐VASc and R 2 CHA 2 DS 2 ‐VASc scores are useful predictors of all‐cause mortality in subjects at high CV risk, with the R 2 CHA 2 DS 2 ‐VASc score being the best performer.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
D’Errico et al. (2022) conducted an observational in High cardiovascular risk (n=1,017). R2CHA2DS2-VASc score vs. CHA2DS2-VASc score was evaluated on 4-year all-cause mortality (delta C-statistic 0.05, 95% CI 0.02-0.07). The R2CHA2DS2-VASc score outperformed the CHA2DS2-VASc score in predicting 4-year all-cause mortality (delta C-statistic 0.05; 95% CI 0.02-0.07).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: