Key result
HAPA-guided exercise rehabilitation improves risk factors and cuts recurrent angina ~80% vs conventional rehabilitation.
Why the study?
Perimenopausal women with CHD face accelerated metabolic disturbances that complicate secondary prevention, but adherence to conventional exercise rehabilitation remains a significant barrier.
Does Health Action Process Approach (HAPA)-guided exercise rehabilitation improve cardiovascular risk factors in perimenopausal women with CHD?
RCT (n=106)
randomly assigned
Does Health Action Process Approach (HAPA)-guided exercise rehabilitation improve cardiovascular risk factors in perimenopausal women with CHD?
p-value: p=<0.05
HAPA-guided exercise rehabilitation significantly improves short-term controllable risk factors, psychological status, and quality of life in perimenopausal women with CHD compared to conventional rehabilitation.
HAPA-guided rehabilitation improves metabolic control and cuts recurrent angina in perimenopausal CHD; extends behavioral strategies for secondary prevention in this population.
Background: Perimenopausal women with coronary heart disease (CHD) face accelerated metabolic disturbances that complicate secondary prevention, yet adherence to conventional exercise rehabilitation remains a significant barrier. Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of Health Action Process Approach (HAPA)-guided cardiac rehabilitation in managing modifiable risk factors and improving secondary prevention outcomes among perimenopausal patients with CHD. Methods: A total of 106 perimenopausal CHD patients were randomly assigned to a control group (conventional exercise rehabilitation) or an experimental group (HAPA-based risk factor intervention). Objective measures (BMI, fasting glucose, lipid profiles, blood pressure, 6-minute walk distance) and subjective scales (SAS, SDS, CCQQ) were assessed at admission and 3 months post-discharge. Clinical outcomes (all-cause mortality, recurrent angina, non-fatal MI, revascularization, heart failure) were also recorded. Results: At the 3-month follow-up, the experimental group showed significantly greater improvements compared to the control group in BMI, blood lipid profiles (TC, TG, LDL-C), blood pressure (SBP, DBP), fasting glucose, 6-minute walk distance, and psychological scores (SAS, SDS) (all P < 0.05), along with a superior quality of life (CCQQ score, P < 0.001). Within-group improvements were significant across all measures in the experimental group (all P < 0.001), while limited to quality of life in the control group. No all-cause mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarction, revascularization, or heart failure occurred. Recurrent angina was reported in 1 patient (1.9%) in the experimental group versus 5 patients (9.4%) in the control group. Conclusion: HAPA-guided exercise cardiac rehabilitation suggests potential improvements in short-term controllable risk factors, psychological status, and quality of life without increasing adverse outcomes in perimenopausal CHD patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guo et al. (2026) conducted an RCT in Coronary heart disease in perimenopausal women (n=106). Health Action Process Approach (HAPA)-guided exercise rehabilitation vs. Conventional exercise rehabilitation was evaluated on Objective measures (BMI, fasting glucose, lipid profiles, blood pressure, 6-minute walk distance) and subjective scales (SAS, SDS, CCQQ) (p=<0.05). HAPA-guided exercise rehabilitation significantly improved modifiable risk factors and reduced recurrent angina (1.9% vs 9.4%) compared to conventional rehabilitation at 3 months.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: