Key result
Biventricular pacing acutely improves load-independent RV contractility by ~43% versus unpaced conduction in LVAD patients.
Why the study?
The hemodynamic effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with LVADs are uncharacterized.
Does biventricular pacing improve load-independent right ventricular contractility in patients with left ventricular assist devices?
RCT (n=15)
Single-blind
Randomly generated sequence
Does biventricular pacing improve load-independent right ventricular contractility in patients with left ventricular assist devices?
Biventricular pacing acutely improves load-independent right ventricular contractility and cardiac output in patients with left ventricular assist devices.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Biventricular pacing may aid acute RV optimization in LVAD patients; extends hemodynamic data to load-independent contractility.
Background The hemodynamic effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) are uncharacterized. We aimed to quantify the hemodynamic effects of different ventricular pacing configurations in patients with LVADs, focusing on short‐term changes in load‐independent right ventricular (RV) contractility. Methods and Results Patients with LVADs underwent right heart catheterization during spontaneous respiration without sedation and with pressures recorded at end expiration. Right heart catheterization was performed at different pacemaker configurations (biventricular pacing, left ventricular pacing, RV pacing, and unpaced conduction) in a randomly generated sequence with >3 minutes between configuration change and hemodynamic assessment. The right heart catheterization operator was blinded to the sequence. RV maximal change in pressure over time normalized to instantaneous pressure was calculated from digitized hemodynamic waveforms, consistent with a previously validated protocol. Fifteen patients with LVADs who were in sinus rhythm were included. Load‐independent RV contractility, as assessed by RV maximal change in pressure over time normalized to instantaneous pressure, was higher in biventricular pacing compared with unpaced conduction (15.7±7.6 versus 11.0±4.0 s −1 ; P =0.003). Thermodilution cardiac output was higher in biventricular pacing compared with unpaced conduction (4.48±0.7 versus 4.38±0.8 L/min; P =0.05). There were no significant differences in heart rate, ventricular filling pressures, or atrioventricular valvular regurgitation across all pacing configurations. Conclusions Biventricular pacing acutely improves load‐independent RV contractility in patients with LVADs. Even in these patients with mechanical left ventricular unloading via LVAD who were relative pacing nonresponders (required LVAD support despite cardiac resynchronization therapy), biventricular pacing was acutely beneficial to RV contractility.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tomashitis et al. (2021) conducted an RCT in Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) (n=15). Biventricular pacing vs. Unpaced conduction was evaluated on Load-independent right ventricular (RV) contractility (RV maximal change in pressure over time normalized to instantaneous pressure) (p=0.003). Biventricular pacing acutely improved load-independent right ventricular contractility compared with unpaced conduction in patients with LVADs (15.7±7.6 vs 11.0±4.0 s-1; P=0.003).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: