Key result
Very early intervention with intravenous metoprolol reduced mean creatine kinase MB isoenzyme release compared to placebo, but the reduction did not achieve statistical significance.
Why the study?
Does very early intervention with intravenous metoprolol reduce myocardial infarct size in patients with presumptive myocardial infarction?
RCT (n=391)
Double-blind
Randomized
Does very early intervention with intravenous metoprolol reduce myocardial infarct size in patients with presumptive myocardial infarction?
Very early administration of intravenous metoprolol in suspected acute myocardial infarction did not significantly reduce infarct size as measured by creatine kinase MB release, though it was generally well tolerated.
All patients with a presumptive diagnosis of myocardial infarction, who were seen within six hours of the onset of symptoms and had no reason for exclusion, were considered for entry into a trial to compare the effects of metoprolol and placebo on creatine kinase MB isoenzyme release. The trial was randomised and double blind. The median time from onset of symptoms to receiving trial drug was just under two hours. Two hundred and four patients (of whom 120 had myocardial infarction) received metoprolol and 187 (of whom 105 had myocardial infarction) received placebo. Infarct size was estimated semiquantitatively using cumulative release of the cardiospecific isoenzyme, creatine kinase MB. Mean creatine kinase MB isoenzyme was less in patients who received metoprolol, but the reduction did not achieve statistical significance. Clinical problems related to early intravenous metoprolol were uncommon.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Boyle et al. (1983) conducted an RCT in Myocardial infarction (n=391). Metoprolol vs. Placebo was evaluated on Creatine kinase MB isoenzyme release. Very early intervention with intravenous metoprolol reduced mean creatine kinase MB isoenzyme release compared to placebo, but the reduction did not achieve statistical significance.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: