PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 1, 2003AJP Heart and Circulatory Physiology48 citations

Estimation of preload recruitable stroke work relationship by a single-beat technique in humans

View Full Paper
WLWen-Shin LeeStanford UniversityWHWen‐Pin HuangSan’an Optoelectronics (China)WYWen‐Chung YuElectrophysiology

Structured PICO

Does a single-beat technique accurately estimate the preload recruitable stroke work relationship compared to standard methods in patients undergoing cardiac catheterization?

P
Population
45 patients studied during cardiac catheterization
I
Intervention
Single-beat technique to estimate preload recruitable stroke work relationship (SBM(w))
C
Comparator
Standard measurement of M(w) requiring alteration of preload
O
Outcome
Correlation between single-beat M(w) and standard M(w)surrogate

The preload recruitable stroke work relationship can be accurately estimated from a single steady-state beat without needing to alter preload, simplifying the assessment of left ventricular contractility.

Abstract

The slope of the preload recruitable stroke work relationship (M(w)) is a highly linear, load-insensitive contractile index. To investigate whether M(w) can be determined from a single steady-state beat, 45 patients were studied during cardiac catheterization. Single-beat M(w) (SBM(w)) was calculated directly from the baseline stroke work and baseline left ventricular (LV) end-diastolic volume (EDV(B)), and the volume-axis intercept (V(w)) was estimated as k x EDV(B) + (k - 1) x LV(wall), where k is the ratio of the epicardial shell volumes corresponding to V(w) and EDV(B) and LV(wall) is the wall volume. The mean of individual k values was 0.72 +/- 0.04, which correlated with LV mass significantly (r = 0.60, P < 0.001). SBM(w) calculated from a constant k of 0.7 predicted M(w) well (r = 0.88, P < 0.0001), and the prediction improved slightly when k was estimated from individual LV mass (r = 0.93, P < 0.0001). Subgroup analyses revealed that the single-beat technique also worked in patients with small or large LV mass or volume or with regional wall motion abnormalities. The absolute change in SBM(w) after dobutamine infusion also correlated with that in M(w). In conclusion, M(w) can be estimated from a steady-state beat without alteration of preload.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Lee et al. (2003) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0b990cd7f95f637495c9c5https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.00455.2002
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Diastolic Compliance of Hypertrophied Ventricle Is Not Acutely Altered by Pharmacologic Agents Influencing Active Processes1993 · 87 citations
  2. 2Relation of Ultrastructure to Function in the Intact Heart: Sarcomere Structure Relative to Pressure Volume Curves of Intact Left Ventricles of Dog and Cat1966 · 241 citations
  3. 3Recommendations regarding quantitation in M-mode echocardiography: results of a survey of echocardiographic measurements.1978 · 7,485 citations
  4. 4Contribution of External Forces to Left Ventricular Diastolic Pressure: Implications for the Clinical Use of the Starling Law1995 · 127 citations
  5. 5Left Ventricular Chamber Function During Inhaled Nitric Oxide in Patients with Dilated Cardiomyopathy1999 · 11 citations