Key result
Azilsartan did not significantly improve left ventricular diastolic dysfunction compared to candesartan, with a least-squares mean difference in E/e′ change of -1.0 (p=0.057).
Why the study?
Given its high myocardial and vascular affinities, azilsartan was hypothesized to improve left ventricular diastolic function more than candesartan in hypertensive patients with HFpEF or HFmrEF.
Does azilsartan improve left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (measured by E/e') compared with candesartan in hypertensive patients with HFpEF or HFmrEF?
RCT (n=193)
Open-label, assessor-blinded
Covariate-adaptive randomization (minimization method)
Yes
Does azilsartan improve left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (measured by E/e') compared with candesartan in hypertensive patients with HFpEF or HFmrEF?
Azilsartan showed a non-significant trend toward improving left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (E/e') compared with candesartan in hypertensive patients with HFpEF or HFmrEF.
Characterized by ventricular and vascular stiffness, heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) has led to high morbidity and mortality. As azilsartan is an angiotensin receptor blocker with the highest myocardial and vascular affinities, azilsartan may improve the left ventricular (LV) diastolic function in patients with hypertension and either HFpEF or HF with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF) more than candesartan. In this randomized, open-label trial, we randomly assigned 193 hypertensive patients with HF and LV ejection fraction ≥ 45% to 20 mg of azilsartan (n = 95) or 8 mg of candesartan (n = 98), once daily for 48 weeks. After the initiation of treatment, changes in the doses of the study drugs were permitted based on the patient’s conditions, including blood pressure (median dose at 48 weeks: azilsartan 20.0 mg/day, candesartan 8.0 mg/day). The primary endpoint was the baseline-adjusted change in the ratio of peak early diastolic transmitral flow velocity (E) to early diastolic mitral annular velocity (e′) (E/e′). Adjusted least-squares mean (LSM) change in E/e′ was − 0.8 (95% confidence interval [CI] − 1.49 to − 0.04) in the azilsartan group and 0.2 (95% CI − 0.49 to 0.94) in the candesartan group, providing the LSM differences of − 1.0 (95% CI − 2.01 to 0.03, P = 0.057). The median change in left atrial volume index was – 2.7 mL/m 2 with azilsartan vs 1.4 mL/m 2 with candesartan (P = 0.091). The frequency of adverse events related to hypotension and hyperkalemia did not differ between the groups. The current study did not provide strong evidence that azilsartan improves LV diastolic dysfunction, and further confirmatory study is required.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ito et al. (2023) conducted an RCT in Heart failure with preserved or mildly reduced ejection fraction and hypertension (n=193). Azilsartan vs. Candesartan (8 mg once daily, titrated 2-12 mg/day) was evaluated on Baseline-adjusted change in E/e′ ratio from baseline to 48 weeks (LSM difference -1.0, 95% CI -2.01 to 0.03, p=0.057). Azilsartan did not significantly improve left ventricular diastolic dysfunction compared to candesartan, with a least-squares mean difference in E/e′ change of -1.0 (p=0.057).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: