Key result
A Kalman filter algorithm estimates SVR within ~3% of invasive measurements in animal models.
Why the study?
Modern LVAD online diagnostics and control rely on cardiovascular system models whose parameters must be identified for the specific patient.
A novel parameter identification algorithm using an unscented Kalman filter accurately estimates cardiovascular system parameters like systemic vascular resistance for LVAD control.
May aid LVAD control algorithm development; leaves open human translation after animal data.
Advancement of implanted left ventricular assist device (LVAD) technology includes modern sensing and control methods to enable online diagnostics and monitoring of patients using on-board sensors. These methods often rely on a cardiovascular system (CVS) model, the parameters of which must be identified for the specific patient. Some of these, such as the systemic vascular resistance (SVR), can be estimated online while others must be identified separately. This paper describes a three-staged approach for designing a parameter identification algorithm (PIA) for this problem. The approach is demonstrated using a two-element Windkessel model of the systemic circulation (SC) with a time-varying elastance for the left ventricle (LV). A parameter identifiability stage is followed by identification using an unscented Kalman filter (UKF), which uses measurements of LV pressure (Plv), aortic pressure (Pao), aortic flow (Qa), and known input measurement of LVAD flowrate (Qvad). Both simulation and experimental data from animal experiments were used to evaluate the presented methods. By bounding the initial guess for left ventricular volume, the identified CVS model is able to reproduce signals of Plv, Pao, and Qa within a normalized root mean squared error (nRMSE) of 5.1%, 19%, and 11%, respectively, during simulations. Experimentally, the identified model is able to estimate SVR with an accuracy of 3.4% compared with values from invasive measurements. Diagnostics and physiological control algorithms on-board modern LVADs could use CVS models other than those shown here, and the presented approach is easily adaptable to them. The methods also demonstrate how to test the robustness and accuracy of the identification algorithm.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pawar et al. (2021) studied Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) monitoring. Parameter identification algorithm using unscented Kalman filter vs. Invasive measurements was evaluated on Accuracy of systemic vascular resistance (SVR) estimation. A parameter identification algorithm using an unscented Kalman filter estimated systemic vascular resistance with an accuracy of 3.4% compared to invasive measurements in animal experiments.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: