Key result
Large animal CHF models provide better clinical translation than rodents via greater structural and functional similarity.
Why the study?
CHF is an unresolved health problem, but existing animal models fail to fully recapitulate human disease and face significant methodological and logistical limitations.
This review highlights the critical need for improved animal models of congestive heart failure that better recapitulate human disease pathogenesis while balancing practical limitations.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May warrant caution translating rodent CHF findings clinically; leaves open optimal large-animal model selection and cost trade-offs.
Congestive heart failure (CHF) has increased over the years, in part because of recent progress in the management of chronic diseases, thus contributing to the maintenance of an increasingly aging population. CHF represents an unresolved health problem and therefore the establishment of animal models that recapitulates the complexity of CHF will become a critical element to be addressed, representing a serious challenge given the complexity of the pathogenesis of CHF itself, which is further compounded by methodological biases that depend on the animal species in use. Animal models of CHF have been developed in many different species, with different surgical procedures, all with promising results but, for the moment, unable to fully recapitulate the human disease. Large animal models often provide a more promising reality, with all the difficulties that their use entails, and which limit their performance to fewer laboratories, the costly of animal housing, animal handling, specialized facilities, skilled methodological training, and reproducibility as another important limiting factor when considering a valid animal model versus potentially better performing alternatives. In this review we will discuss the different animal models of CHF, their advantages and, above all, the limitations of each procedure with respect to effectiveness of results in terms of clinical application.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Saura et al. (2022) conducted a review in Congestive heart failure. Preclinical animal models was evaluated. Preclinical large animal models of congestive heart failure provide greater structural and functional similarity to humans for clinical translation compared to rodent models, despite higher costs.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: