Key result
Having one first-degree relative with MI linked to ~46% greater incident MI risk.
Why the study?
Does a detailed family history of myocardial infarction (including second-degree relatives) increase the risk of incident myocardial infarction in the general population?
Cohort (n=4,400,000)
Yes
Does a detailed family history of myocardial infarction (including second-degree relatives) increase the risk of incident myocardial infarction in the general population?
Effect estimate: IRR 1.46 (95% CI 1.42-1.49)
A detailed family history of myocardial infarction, including the number of affected first- and second-degree relatives, significantly and dose-dependently increases the risk of incident MI, particularly in middle-aged individuals.
May refine MI risk stratification in middle-aged adults; leaves open whether it improves outcomes beyond standard factors.
BACKGROUND: Family history of myocardial infarction (MI) is an independent risk factor for MI. Several genetic variants are associated with increased risk of MI and family history of MI in a first-degree relative doubles MI risk. However, although family history of MI is not a simple dichotomous risk factor, the impact of specific, detailed family histories has not received much attention, despite its high clinical relevance. We examined risk of MI by MIs in first- and second-degree relatives and by number and age of affected relatives. METHODS AND FINDINGS: Using Danish national registers, we established a nationwide cohort of persons born between 1930 and 1992 with identifiable first- or second-degree relatives. Incident MIs in both cohort members and relatives aged ≥20 years were identified. We calculated incidence rate ratios (IRRs) for MI by family history of MI, by Poisson regression. In 4.4 million persons followed for 104 million person-years, we identified 128,384 incident MIs. IRRs with 95% confidence intervals [CIs] for MI by history of MI in 1, 2 or ≥3 first-degree relatives were 1.46 (1.42-1.49), 2.38 (2.22-2.56) and 3.58 (2.66-4.81), respectively. Corresponding estimates for second-degree relatives were 1.17 (1.05-1.30), 1.87 (1.46-2.38) and 2.18 (1.09-4.36). A history of MI in combinations of first- and second-degree relatives increased risks 1.8- to 7-fold in middle-aged persons (36 to 55 years). Estimates were robust to adjustment for diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia and use of cardiovascular medications. CONCLUSION: A detailed family history, particularly number of affected first- and second-degree relatives, contributes meaningfully to risk assessment, especially in middle-aged persons. Future studies should test for potential improvement of risk algorithm prediction using detailed family histories.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ranthe et al. (2015) conducted a cohort in Myocardial Infarction (n=4,400,000). Family history of myocardial infarction vs. No family history of myocardial infarction was evaluated on Incident myocardial infarction (IRR 1.46, 95% CI 1.42-1.49). A family history of myocardial infarction in 1, 2, or ≥3 first-degree relatives increased the risk of incident MI with IRRs of 1.46, 2.38, and 3.58, respectively.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: