Key result
Differentiating hypertensive emergencies from urgencies remains critical to guide appropriate blood pressure lowering management.
This narrative review summarizes recent evidence on the recognition, risk stratification, and management of hypertensive crises in the emergency department.
Supports differentiating crises for safe ED BP management; leaves open optimal targets pending prospective trials.
Despite the high prevalence of hypertension (HTN), only a small proportion of the hypertensive patients will ultimately develop hypertensive crisis. In fact, some patients with hypertensive crisis do not report a history of HTN or previous use of antihypertensive medication. The majority of the patients with hypertensive crisis often report non-specific symptoms, whereas heart-related symptoms (dyspnea, chest pain, arrhythmias, and syncope) are less common. Hypertensive crises can be divided into hypertensive emergencies or hypertensive urgencies according to the presence or absence of acute target organ damage, respectively. This differentiation is an extremely useful classification in clinical practice since a different management is needed, which in turn has a significant effect on the morbidity and mortality of these patients. Therefore, it is very crucial for the physician in the emergency department to identify the hypertensive emergencies and to manage them through blood pressure lowering medications in order to avoid further target organ damage or deterioration. The aim of this narrative review is to summarize the recent evidence in an effort to improve the awareness, recognition, risk stratification, and treatment of hypertensive crisis in patients referred to the emergency department.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Varounis et al. (2017) conducted a review in Hypertensive crisis. A narrative review of recent evidence highlights the critical need for differentiating hypertensive emergencies from urgencies to guide appropriate blood pressure lowering management.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: