PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 1, 1997American Journal of Epidemiology842 citationsOpen Access

Body Fat Distribution and Risk of Non-Insulin-dependent Diabetes Mellitus in Women: The Nurses' Health Study

View Full Paper
VCVincent J. CareyEWE WaltersGCGraham A. Colditz

Key Result

Higher BMI, waist-to-hip ratio, and waist circumference were powerful independent predictors of NIDDM in women, with the 90th vs 10th percentile of BMI associated with an 11.2-fold increased risk.

Key Points

  • This research aims to analyze how different measures of obesity relate to the risk of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus in women.
  • Analyzed data from 43,581 women in the Nurses' Health Study, free from diabetes in 1986.
  • Measured waist, hip, and weight data provided in 1986, with follow-up until 1994.
  • Adjusted for age, family history, smoking, exercise, and dietary factors during analysis.
  • The relative risk of NIDDM for women in the 90th percentile of BMI was 11.2 (95% CI 7.9-15.9).
  • For waist-hip ratio, the relative risk was 3.1 (95% CI 2.3-4.1) for the 90th percentile versus the 10th.
  • The risk associated with waist circumference showed a relative risk of 5.1 (95% CI 2.9-8.9) for the higher percentile compared to the lower.

Study Design

Type

Cohort (n=43,581)

Structured PICO

Do higher BMI, waist-to-hip ratio, and waist circumference increase the risk of incident non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus in women?

P
Population
43,581 women enrolled in the Nurses' Health Study, initially free from diabetes and other major chronic diseases
I
Intervention
Higher percentiles of body mass index (BMI), waist:hip ratio (WHR), and waist circumference
C
Comparator
Lower percentiles (10th percentile) of BMI, WHR, and waist circumference
O
Outcome
Incidence of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM)hard clinical

BMI, waist-to-hip ratio, and waist circumference are powerful independent predictors of incident type 2 diabetes in women.

Main Result

Effect estimate: RR 11.2 (95% CI 7.9-15.9)

Abstract

Obesity is an established risk factor for non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM). Anthropometric measures of overall and central obesity as predictors of NIDDM risk have not been as well studied, especially in women. Among 43,581 women enrolled in the Nurses' Health Study who in 1986 provided waist, hip, and weight information and who were initially free from diabetes and other major chronic diseases, NIDDM incidence was followed from 1986 to 1994. After adjustment for age, family history of diabetes, smoking, exercise, and several dietary factors, the relative risk of NIDDM for the 90th percentile of body mass index (BMI) (weight (kg)/height (m)2) (BMI = 29.9) versus the 10th percentile (BMI = 20.1) was 11.2 (95% confidence interval (CI) 7.9-15.9). Controlling for BMI and other potentially confounding factors, the relative risk for the 90th percentile of waist: hip ratio (WHR) (WHR = 0.86) versus the 10th percentile (WHR = 0.70) was 3.1 (95% CI 2.3-4.1), and the relative risk for the 90th percentile of waist circumference (36.2 inches or 92 cm) versus the 10th percentile (26.2 inches or 67 cm) was 5.1 (95% CI 2.9-8.9). BMI, WHR, and waist circumference are powerful independent predictors of NIDDM in US women. Measurement of BMI and waist circumference (with or without hip circumference) are potentially useful tools for clinicians in counseling patients regarding NIDDM risk and risk reduction.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Carey et al. (1997) conducted a cohort in Non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) (n=43,581). 90th percentile of body mass index (BMI) vs. 10th percentile of BMI was evaluated on NIDDM incidence (RR 11.2, 95% CI 7.9-15.9). Higher BMI, waist-to-hip ratio, and waist circumference were powerful independent predictors of NIDDM in women, with the 90th vs 10th percentile of BMI associated with an 11.2-fold increased risk.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0c6bb263ad68335d233c0bhttps://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009158
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper