Key result
Initiating sacubitril/valsartan at SBP <100 is linked to ~91% more adverse events versus SBP 110-119.
Why the study?
Heart failure patients with low systolic blood pressure face poor prognosis, and the use of sacubitril/valsartan in this population has not been fully examined.
Does baseline systolic blood pressure affect the risk of adverse events in heart failure patients initiating sacubitril/valsartan?
Cohort (n=964)
Yes
Does baseline systolic blood pressure affect the risk of adverse events in heart failure patients initiating sacubitril/valsartan?
Effect estimate: OR 1.91 (95% CI 1.13-3.23)
p-value: p=0.02
Initiating sacubitril/valsartan in heart failure patients with lower baseline systolic blood pressure (<110 mm Hg) is associated with a significantly higher risk of adverse events within 3 months, particularly in those with advanced NYHA class or severe renal impairment.
Sacubitril/valsartan initiation in SBP <100 mm Hg was associated with more adverse events; leaves open safe thresholds pending randomized data.
Background Patients with heart failure exhibiting low systolic blood pressure (SBP) have a poor prognosis. Sacubitril/valsartan reduces cardiovascular events; however, its use in patients with low SBP has not been fully examined. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to investigate the association between baseline SBP and adverse events (AEs) in patients starting sacubitril/valsartan therapy using data from a real-world registry in Japan. Methods We analysed data from a multicentre retrospective study, including patients who initiated sacubitril/valsartan between August 2020 and August 2021. The patients were categorised into five groups based on their baseline SBP (<100, 100–109, 110–119, 120–129 and ≥130 mm Hg). The composite of AEs occurring within 3 months according to baseline SBP and the patient characteristics associated with AEs in a baseline SBP <110 mm Hg were analysed. Results Among the 964 patients newly prescribed sacubitril/valsartan, the median (IQR) age was 73 (61–80) years, and 388 (40.2%) patients had a baseline SBP <110 mm Hg. AEs occurred in 24% (n=232) of patients. The adjusted ORs for all AEs were 1.91 (95% CI (CI) 1.13–3.23; p=0.02) for the SBP <100 mm Hg group and 3.33 (95% CI 1.98 to 5.59; p<0.001) for the SBP 100–109 mm Hg group, compared with the SBP 110–119 mm Hg group. In patients with a baseline SBP <110 mm Hg, factors associated with an increased risk of AEs included a higher New York Heart Association class (II, III or IV) and a lower estimated glomerular filtration rate <30 mL/min/1.73 m 2 . Conclusions Caution is needed when initiating sacubitril/valsartan in patients with lower baseline SBP. The severity of heart failure and kidney function may be useful for risk stratification in these high-risk patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kanaoka et al. (2024) conducted a cohort in Heart failure (n=964). Sacubitril/valsartan vs. Baseline SBP 110-119 mm Hg was evaluated on Composite of adverse events within 3 months (OR 1.91, 95% CI 1.13-3.23, p=0.02). Sacubitril/valsartan initiation in heart failure patients with SBP <100 mm Hg increased adverse events compared to SBP 110-119 mm Hg (OR 1.91; 95% CI 1.13-3.23; p=0.02).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: