Key result
Self-blood pressure monitoring shows no benefit over usual care for SBP reduction or control.
Why the study?
Does self-blood pressure monitoring improve systolic blood pressure reduction in medically underserved, urban minority populations?
RCT (n=900)
Yes
Does self-blood pressure monitoring improve systolic blood pressure reduction in medically underserved, urban minority populations?
Absolute Event Rate: 14.7% vs 14.1%
p-value: p=0.70
Self-blood pressure monitoring alone did not improve blood pressure control compared to usual care in a medically underserved, urban, minority population, suggesting additional barriers to control exist.
Self-BP monitoring adds no benefit over usual care in underserved urban minorities; challenges assumptions that monitoring alone suffices without addressing other barriers.
BACKGROUND: Hypertension is a leading risk factor for cardiovascular disease. Although control rates have improved over time, racial/ethnic disparities in hypertension control persist. Self-blood pressure monitoring, by itself, has been shown to be an effective tool in predominantly white populations, but less studied in minority, urban communities. These types of minimally intensive approaches are important to test in all populations, especially those experiencing related health disparities, for broad implementation with limited resources. METHODS AND RESULTS: The New York City Health Department in partnership with community clinic networks implemented a randomized clinical trial (n=900, 450 per arm) to investigate the effectiveness of self-blood pressure monitoring in medically underserved and largely black and Hispanic participants. Intervention participants received a home blood pressure monitor and training on use, whereas control participants received usual care. After 9 months, systolic blood pressure decreased (intervention, 14.7 mm Hg; control, 14.1 mm Hg; P=0.70). Similar results were observed when incorporating longitudinal data and calculating a mean slope over time. Control was achieved in 38.9% of intervention and 39.1% of control participants at the end of follow-up; the time-to-event experience of achieving blood pressure control in the intervention versus control groups were not different from each other (logrank P value =0.91). CONCLUSIONS: Self-blood pressure monitoring was not shown to improve control over usual care in this largely minority, urban population. The patient population in this study, which included a high proportion of Hispanics and uninsured persons, is understudied. Results indicate these groups may have additional meaningful barriers to achieving blood pressure control beyond access to the monitor itself. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: http://clinicaltrials.gov. Unique Identifier: NCT01123577.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yi et al. (2015) conducted an RCT in Hypertension (n=900). Self-blood pressure monitoring vs. Usual care was evaluated on Decrease in systolic blood pressure (p=0.70). Self-blood pressure monitoring did not significantly improve systolic blood pressure reduction (14.7 vs 14.1 mm Hg; P=0.70) or blood pressure control (38.9% vs 39.1%) compared to usual care.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: