Key result
Home blood pressure monitoring with nurse-led telephone support did not significantly reduce systolic blood pressure compared to usual care in patients with a history of stroke (adjusted MD 0.3 mm Hg).
Why the study?
Does home blood pressure monitoring with nurse-led telephone support reduce systolic blood pressure in patients with hypertension and a history of stroke?
RCT (n=381)
Open-label
Computer-generated stratified randomization
Yes
Does home blood pressure monitoring with nurse-led telephone support reduce systolic blood pressure in patients with hypertension and a history of stroke?
Effect estimate: Adjusted MD 0.3 (95% CI -3.6 to 4.2)
Absolute Event Rate: 1.7% vs -0.7%
Home blood pressure monitoring with nurse-led telephone support did not significantly reduce systolic blood pressure compared to usual care in patients with hypertension and prior stroke.
Does not support home BP monitoring with nurse support post-stroke; challenges extrapolation from positive trials in broader hypertension populations.
BACKGROUND: Adequate control of blood pressure reduces the risk of recurrent stroke. We conducted a randomized controlled study to determine whether home blood pressure monitoring with nurse-led telephone support would reduce blood pressure in patients with hypertension and a history of stroke. METHODS: We recruited 381 participants (mean age 72 years) from outpatient and inpatient stroke clinics between Mar. 1, 2007, and Aug. 31, 2009. Nearly half (45%, 170) of the participants had some disability due to stroke. Participants were visited at home for a baseline assessment and randomly allocated to home blood pressure monitoring (n = 187) or usual care (n = 194). Those in the intervention group were given a monitor, brief training and telephone support. Participants who had home blood pressure readings consistently over target (target < 130/80 mm Hg) were advised to consult their family physician. The main outcome measure was a fall in systolic blood pressure after 12 months, measured by an independent researcher unaware of group allocation. RESULTS: Despite more patients in the intervention group than in the control group having changes to antihypertensive treatment during the trial period (60.1% [98/163] v. 47.6% [78/164], p = 0.02), the fall in systolic blood pressure from baseline did not differ significantly between the groups (adjusted mean difference 0.3 mm Hg, 95% confidence interval -3.6 to 4.2 mm Hg). Subgroup analysis showed significant interaction with disability due to stroke (p = 0.03 at 6 months) and baseline blood pressure (p = 0.03 at 12 months). INTERPRETATION: Overall, home monitoring did not improve blood pressure control in patients with hypertension and a history of stroke. It was associated with a fall in systolic pressure in patients who had uncontrolled blood pressure at baseline and those without disability due to stroke. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov registration NCT00514800.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kerry et al. (2012) conducted an RCT in Hypertension and history of stroke (n=381). Home blood pressure monitoring with nurse-led telephone support vs. Usual care was evaluated on Fall in mean systolic blood pressure from baseline (Adjusted MD 0.3, 95% CI -3.6 to 4.2). Home blood pressure monitoring with nurse-led telephone support did not significantly reduce systolic blood pressure compared to usual care in patients with a history of stroke (adjusted MD 0.3 mm Hg).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: