Key result
Stroke education program boosts 12-month home blood pressure monitoring rates from 62.5% to 100%.
Why the study?
Stroke patients need to control risk factors for recurrence, but it is unclear if an education program can improve home blood pressure measurement behavior.
Does an education program improve adherence to home blood pressure measurements in stroke patients?
RCT (n=48)
Open-label
randomly assigned
Does an education program improve adherence to home blood pressure measurements in stroke patients?
Absolute Event Rate: 100% vs 62.5%
p-value: p=<.001
A 6-month education and support program significantly improves long-term adherence to home blood pressure monitoring in stroke patients.
Education programs may boost home BP monitoring in stroke patients; hypothesis-generating and requires randomized trials before practice change.
BACKGROUND : Stroke patients must review their previous lifestyle and take daily actions to control risk factors for recurrence. METHODS : A nonblind, randomized controlled trial was conducted in stroke patients to determine whether an education program intervention would alter behavior concerning home blood pressure measurements. This prospective, randomized controlled trial recruited 48 inpatients with stroke randomly assigned to an intervention group (n = 24) or a usual care group (n = 24). The intervention involved 5 face-to-face support or telephone support sessions over 6 months to provide information regarding home blood pressure measurements and to confirm patient behavior using a textbook, a blood pressure recording form, and a blood pressure measurement device. RESULTS : There were no significant differences at baseline between the intervention and usual care groups. The median rate of performing home blood pressure measurements at 12 months was significantly higher in the intervention group (100.0% [99.1%-100.0%], n = 24) than the control group (62.5% [27.7%-87.5%], n = 24) ( P < .001). The rates of home blood pressure measurements (at 1, 3, and 7 months after registration) were also significantly higher in the intervention group. Seven months after registration, home blood pressure values (systolic blood pressure) were significantly lower in the intervention group than the control group ( P = .025). In contrast, there was no significant difference at 1, 3, or 12 months after registration. CONCLUSION : Our results suggest that although the rate of home blood pressure measurements in both groups decreased, the rate was higher in the intervention group compared with the usual care group, indicating that the intervention was effective.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kishita et al. (2022) conducted an RCT in stroke (n=48). Education program vs. Usual care was evaluated on Rate of performing home blood pressure measurements at 12 months (p=<.001). An education program for stroke patients significantly increased the median rate of performing home blood pressure measurements at 12 months compared to usual care (100.0% vs 62.5%; P<.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: