Key result
Low-dose vitamin K1 shows no increased thromboembolism risk in mechanical valve patients with supratherapeutic INR.
Why the study?
This study aimed to investigate the safety of low-dose vitamin K1 in patients with mechanical heart valves who have supratherapeutic INR.
Does low-dose vitamin K1 affect the rate of thromboembolism or bleeding in patients with mechanical heart valves and supratherapeutic INR?
Meta-Analysis
Does low-dose vitamin K1 affect the rate of thromboembolism or bleeding in patients with mechanical heart valves and supratherapeutic INR?
Effect estimate: RR 0.94 (95% CI 0.19-4.55)
Low-dose vitamin K1 does not appear to increase the risk of thromboembolism or bleeding in patients with mechanical heart valves and supratherapeutic INR, though larger studies are needed to confirm safety.
Low-dose vitamin K1 appears safe for thromboembolism risk in this setting; leaves open confirmation of net benefit in larger trials.
BACKGROUND: Patients who had mechanical heart valves and an international normalized ratio (INR) of >5.0 should be managed by temporary cessation of vitamin K antagonist. This study aimed to investigate the safety of low-dose vitamin K1 in patients with mechanical heart valves who have supratherapeutic INR. METHODS: CINAHL, Cochran Library, Clinical trial.gov, OpenGrey, PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Scopus were systematically searched from the inception up to October 2021 without language restriction. Studies comparing the safety of low-dose vitamin K1 treatment in patients with placebo or other anticoagulant reversal agents were included. We used a random-effect model for the meta-analysis. Publication bias was determined by a funnel plot with subsequent Begg's test and Egger's test. RESULTS: From 7529 retrieved studies, 3 randomized control trials were included in the meta-analysis. Pooled data demonstrated that low-dose vitamin K was not associated with thromboembolism rate (risk ratio [RR] = 0.94; 95% CI: 0.19-4.55) major bleeding rate (RR = 0.58; 95% CI: 0.07-4.82), and minor bleeding rate (RR = 0.60; 95% CI: 0.07-5.09). Subgroup and sensitivity analysis demonstrated the nonsignificant effect of low-dose vitamin K on the risk of thromboembolism. Publication bias was not apparent, according to Begg's test and Egger's test (P = .090 and 0.134, respectively). CONCLUSION: The current evidence does not support the role of low-dose vitamin K as a trigger of thromboembolism in supratherapeutic INR patients with mechanical heart valves. Nevertheless, more well-designed studies with larger sample sizes are required to justify this research question.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sapapsap et al. (2022) conducted a meta-analysis in Mechanical heart valves with supratherapeutic INR. Vitamin K1 vs. Placebo or other anticoagulant reversal agents was evaluated on Thromboembolism rate (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.19-4.55). Low-dose vitamin K1 was not associated with an increased risk of thromboembolism (RR 0.94; 95% CI 0.19-4.55) in patients with mechanical heart valves and supratherapeutic INR.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: