Key result
Mild lower body suction (5-20 mmHg) in healthy men significantly decreased aortic pulse area, with 47% of the decline occurring by 5 mmHg, triggering efficient haemodynamic adjustments.
Why the study?
Does graded lower body suction alter arterial pressure, cardiac autonomic outflow, and thoracic aorta dimensions in healthy young men?
Does graded lower body suction alter arterial pressure, cardiac autonomic outflow, and thoracic aorta dimensions in healthy young men?
p-value: p=<0.05
Small reductions in effective blood volume reduce aortic baroreceptive areas and trigger efficient hemodynamic adjustments, challenging the notion that 'non-hypotensive' hypovolemia does not alter arterial pressure or baroreceptor activity.
Challenges assumption that non-hypotensive hypovolemia spares baroreceptor activity; hypothesis-generating for aortic responses in clinical settings.
The notion that small, 'non-hypotensive' reductions of effective blood volume alter neither arterial pressure nor arterial baroreceptor activity is pervasive in the experimental literature. We tested two hypotheses: (a) that minute arterial pressure and cardiac autonomic outflow changes during hypovolaemia induced by lower body suction in humans are masked by alterations in breathing, and (b) that evidence for arterial baroreflex engagement might be obtained from measurements of thoracic aorta dimensions. 2. In two studies, responses to graded lower body suction at 0 (control), 5, 10, 15, 20 and 40 mmHg were examined in twelve and ten healthy young men, respectively. In the first, arterial pressure (photoplethysmograph), R-R interval, and respiratory sinus arrhythmia amplitude (complex demodulation) were measured during uncontrolled and controlled breathing (constant breathing frequency and tidal volume). In the second, cross-sectional areas of the ascending thoracic aorta were calculated from nuclear magnetic resonance images. 3. Lower body suction with controlled breathing resulted in an increased arterial pulse pressure at mild levels (5-20 mmHg; ANOVA, P < 0.05) and a decreased arterial pulse pressure at moderate levels (40 mmHg; ANOVA, P < 0.05). Both R-R intervals and respiratory sinus arrhythmia were negatively related to lower body suction level, whether group averages (general linear regression, r > 0.92) or individual subjects (orthogonal polynomials, 12 of 12 subjects) were assessed. 4. Aortic pulse area decreased progressively and significantly during mild lower body suction, with 47% of the total decline occurring by 5 mmHg. 5. These results suggest that small reductions of effective blood volume reduce aortic baroreceptive areas and trigger haemodynamic adjustments which are so efficient that alterations in arterial pressure escape detection by conventional means.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Taylor et al. (1995) studied Healthy (n=22). Graded lower body suction vs. 0 mmHg (control) was evaluated on Arterial pulse pressure and aortic pulse area (p=<0.05). Mild lower body suction (5-20 mmHg) in healthy men significantly decreased aortic pulse area, with 47% of the decline occurring by 5 mmHg, triggering efficient haemodynamic adjustments.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: