Key result
DAPT shows no benefit over aspirin for 90-day recurrent ischemic stroke post-thrombolysis.
Why the study?
Recurrent neurological symptoms after thrombolysis in AIS present management challenges due to limited evidence guiding antiplatelet therapy and a lack of standardized recommendations.
Does dual antiplatelet therapy reduce recurrent ischemic stroke in adult patients with acute ischemic stroke and recurrent symptoms post-thrombolysis compared to aspirin monotherapy?
Population
2,502 AIS patients with recurrent symptoms 1 to 30 days post-thrombolysis (889 pairs matched)
Comparison
DAPT (aspirin plus clopidogrel) vs aspirin monotherapy
Design
Retrospective propensity score-matched cohort study across over 66 hospitals
Follow-up
90 days
Authors
Loading...
Supports equipoise between aspirin monotherapy and DAPT; leaves open need for randomized confirmation.
Cohort (n=1,778)
Yes
Does dual antiplatelet therapy reduce recurrent ischemic stroke in adult patients with acute ischemic stroke and recurrent symptoms post-thrombolysis compared to aspirin monotherapy?
Effect estimate: OR 0.969 (95% CI 0.731-1.285)
Absolute Event Rate: 12.6% vs 12.2%
p-value: p=0.8293
DAPT does not provide a significant advantage over aspirin monotherapy in reducing recurrent stroke or mortality in AIS patients with recurrent symptoms post-thrombolysis.
Nwogu et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Acute Ischemic Stroke with Recurrent Symptoms Post-thrombolysis (n=1,778). Dual antiplatelet therapy (aspirin plus clopidogrel) vs. Aspirin monotherapy was evaluated on Recurrence of ischemic stroke within 90 days (OR 0.969, 95% CI 0.731-1.285, p=0.8293). Dual antiplatelet therapy did not significantly reduce the 90-day risk of recurrent ischemic stroke compared to aspirin monotherapy (12.6% vs 12.2%, OR 0.969) in patients with acute ischemic stroke and recurrent symptoms post-thrombolysis.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: