Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Retrospective case-control study identifies risks for reintervention in congenital heart disease patients, suggesting important predictive factors.
Background: Interventional occlusion procedures for congenital heart disease (CHD) carry the risk of complications requiring reintervention, yet predictive factors remain unclear. Methods: This retrospective case–control study included patients (n = 4190) with simple CHD who underwent transcatheter/interventional procedure (2017–2022). Perioperative and postoperative complications were monitored at 1, 3, and 6 months after occlusion. Among them, 44 patients required reintervention for complications. Statistical analysis was performed on clinical data, ultrasound findings from various locations, and laboratory examination results. Results: For atrial septal defects (ASD), independent predictors were defect size and age grading, while those for ventricular septal defects (VSD) were occluder device size, aortic annulus inner diameter, body surface area class, and whether the defect was isolated. The areas under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for patients who experienced severe complications requiring surgical repair according to ASD were 0.723, whereas for VSD, the AUCs for occluder device size and aortic valve annulus diameter among patients who experienced severe complications requiring surgical repair were 0.649 and 0.539, respectively. Conclusions: This study provides an inaugural comprehensive analysis of occurrence rates and predictive factors for severe post-interventional occlusion procedure complications requiring reintervention. These findings offer new insights as a reference for the treatment of CHD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Deng et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: