Key result
Greater 3D-longitudinal strain peak standard deviation is linked to successful CRT response.
Why the study?
Does 3D-longitudinal strain computation predict echocardiographic response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in heart failure patients?
Observational (n=48)
Does 3D-longitudinal strain computation predict echocardiographic response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in heart failure patients?
Absolute Event Rate: 1.18% vs 0.83%
p-value: p=0.007
A novel 3D-longitudinal strain computation software may help predict echocardiographic response to cardiac resynchronization therapy, though larger studies are needed.
May aid CRT response prediction via 3D strain dispersion; hypothesis-generating and requires larger prospective validation.
Almost all attempts to improve patient selection for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) using echo-derived indices have failed so far. We sought to assess: the performance of homemade software for the automatic quantification of integral 3D regional longitudinal strain curves exploring left ventricular (LV) mechanics and the potential value of this tool to predict CRT response. Forty-eight heart failure patients in sinus rhythm, referred for CRT-implantation (mean age: 65 years; LV-ejection fraction: 26%; QRS-duration: 160 milliseconds) were prospectively explored. Thirty-four patients (71%) had positive responses, defined as an LV end-systolic volume decrease ≥15% at 6-months. 3D–longitudinal strain curves were exported for analysis using custom-made algorithms. The integrals of the longitudinal strain signals (I L,peak) were automatically measured and calculated for all 17 LV-segments. The standard deviation of longitudinal strain peak (SDI L,peak ) for all 17 LV-segments was greater in CRT responders than non-responders (1.18% s−1 [0.96; 1.35] versus 0.83% s−1 [0.55; 0.99], p = 0.007). The optimal cut-off value of SDI L,peak to predict response was 1.037%.s−1. In the 18-patients without septal flash, SDI L,peak was significantly higher in the CRT-responders. This new automatic software for analyzing 3D longitudinal strain curves is avoiding previous limitations of imaging techniques for assessing dyssynchrony and then its value will have to be tested in a large group of patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fournet et al. (2017) conducted an observational in Heart failure (n=48). 3D-longitudinal strain computation was evaluated on CRT response (LV end-systolic volume decrease ≥15% at 6-months) (p=0.007). 3D-longitudinal strain computation revealed a significantly greater standard deviation of longitudinal strain peak in CRT responders compared to non-responders (1.18 vs 0.83 % s-1, p=0.007).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: