Key result
Aortic impedance indices from MR and tonometry are independently linked to left ventricular remodeling.
Why the study?
Are noninvasively estimated aortic impedance indices from MR and tonometry associated with age and left ventricular remodeling in healthy subjects?
Observational (n=70)
Are noninvasively estimated aortic impedance indices from MR and tonometry associated with age and left ventricular remodeling in healthy subjects?
Effect estimate: r = 0.30 (Zc), r = 0.43 (TPR)
p-value: p=<0.01
Aortic impedance indices derived noninvasively from MR and tonometry are reliably associated with age and left ventricular remodeling.
Hypothesis-generating for noninvasive aortic impedance assessment; leaves open prognostic value and clinical utility.
PURPOSE: We sought to noninvasively estimate aortic impedance indices from MR and tonometric data. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MR aortic velocity-encoded and carotid applanation tonometry pressure data of 70 healthy subjects (19-79 years) were used to calculate the following indices from impedance spectrum: (i) characteristic impedance (Zc) reflecting pulsatile component of left ventricular (LV) afterload, (ii) frequency of the minimal impedance magnitude related to arterial compliance (FMIN ), (iii) total peripheral resistance (TPR) related to steady LV load, (iv) impedance oscillatory index (ZINDEX ) related to proximal reflections, and (v) reflection magnitude (RM). Associations with age and LV remodeling (LV mass/end-diastolic volume) were investigated using multivariate analysis. RESULTS: All indices except Zc were associated with age independent of subjects characteristics and systolic blood pressures. They were all significantly associated with the well-established carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (r ≥ 0.29; P < 0.01). However, such associations were not independent of age. Pulsatile index Zc was independently associated with carotid pulse pressure (r = 0.53, P < 0.001). Moreover, conversely to conventional stiffness indices, Zc and TPR were independently associated with LV remodeling (r = 0.30, r = 0.43, respectively, P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: We estimated aortic impedance from velocity-encoded MR and tonometry data resulting in reliable impedance and reflection indices as confirmed by their significant and independent associations with age and LV remodeling.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bargiotas et al. (2014) conducted an observational in Healthy subjects (n=70). MR aortic velocity-encoded and carotid applanation tonometry was evaluated on Association of aortic impedance indices with age and left ventricular remodeling (r = 0.30 (Zc), r = 0.43 (TPR), p=<0.01). Aortic impedance indices derived from MR and tonometry, specifically characteristic impedance and total peripheral resistance, were independently associated with left ventricular remodeling (P<0.01).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: