Key result
LV remodeling three months post-STEMI is linked to a ~14% lower global myocardial work index.
Why the study?
Assessment of LV remodeling post-STEMI is pivotal, and noninvasive myocardial work indices from echocardiography-derived strain-pressure loops offer a new method to characterize LV mechanics in these patients.
Do noninvasive myocardial work indices differ between STEMI patients with and without LV remodeling at 3 months?
Observational (n=600)
Do noninvasive myocardial work indices differ between STEMI patients with and without LV remodeling at 3 months?
Absolute Event Rate: 1708% vs 1979%
p-value: p=<.001
STEMI patients with LV remodeling at 3 months have significantly more impaired noninvasive myocardial work indices compared to those without remodeling.
May flag higher remodeling risk post-STEMI; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before clinical adoption.
•Impaired myocardial work indices are frequent in patients with LV remodeling.•Persistent anaerobic myocardial metabolism could explain impaired myocardial work.•Interestingly, patients without LV remodeling may have impaired myocardial work. BackgroundAssessment of left ventricular (LV) remodeling after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is pivotal for patient management. Noninvasive myocardial work indices obtained from echocardiography-derived strain-pressure loops provide a new tool that permits characterization of LV mechanics. We aimed at characterizing myocardial work indices in patients with LV remodeling after STEMI versus patients without remodeling.MethodsSix-hundred STEMI patients were retrospectively analyzed (456 men, mean age: 61 ± 11 years) and divided according to the presence of LV remodeling 3 months after the index admission (≥20% increase in LV end-diastolic volume). Noninvasive myocardial work indices were measured at 3 months after STEMI.ResultsLV remodeling was observed in 150 patients (25%) who showed more impaired global myocardial work indices compared with their counterparts: work index (1,708 ± 522 mm Hg% vs 1,979 ± 450 mm Hg%; P < .001), constructive work (1,941 ± 598 mm Hg% vs 2,272 ± 519 mm Hg%; P < .001), and work efficiency (92% [range 88%-96%] vs 95% [range 93%-96%]; P < .001). In addition, patients with LV remodeling had significantly increased wasted work (116 mm Hg% [range 73-184 mm Hg%] vs 91 mm Hg% [range 61-132 mm Hg%]; P < .001). The frequency of impaired global work index, constructive and work efficiency, and increased wasted work was significantly higher among patients with LV remodeling compared with their counterparts: 21.3%, 34.7%, 34.7%, and 14.0%, respectively, versus 5.3%, 9.6%, 8.9%, and 4.9%, respectively (P < .001).ConclusionsAt 3-month follow-up after STEMI, patients with LV remodeling revealed more impaired myocardial work indices compared with patients without LV remodeling. The prevalence of impaired myocardial work indices was higher among patients with LV remodeling compared with patients without. Assessment of left ventricular (LV) remodeling after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is pivotal for patient management. Noninvasive myocardial work indices obtained from echocardiography-derived strain-pressure loops provide a new tool that permits characterization of LV mechanics. We aimed at characterizing myocardial work indices in patients with LV remodeling after STEMI versus patients without remodeling. Six-hundred STEMI patients were retrospectively analyzed (456 men, mean age: 61 ± 11 years) and divided according to the presence of LV remodeling 3 months after the index admission (≥20% increase in LV end-diastolic volume). Noninvasive myocardial work indices were measured at 3 months after STEMI. LV remodeling was observed in 150 patients (25%) who showed more impaired global myocardial work indices compared with their counterparts: work index (1,708 ± 522 mm Hg% vs 1,979 ± 450 mm Hg%; P < .001), constructive work (1,941 ± 598 mm Hg% vs 2,272 ± 519 mm Hg%; P < .001), and work efficiency (92% [range 88%-96%] vs 95% [range 93%-96%]; P < .001). In addition, patients with LV remodeling had significantly increased wasted work (116 mm Hg% [range 73-184 mm Hg%] vs 91 mm Hg% [range 61-132 mm Hg%]; P < .001). The frequency of impaired global work index, constructive and work efficiency, and increased wasted work was significantly higher among patients with LV remodeling compared with their counterparts: 21.3%, 34.7%, 34.7%, and 14.0%, respectively, versus 5.3%, 9.6%, 8.9%, and 4.9%, respectively (P < .001). At 3-month follow-up after STEMI, patients with LV remodeling revealed more impaired myocardial work indices compared with patients without LV remodeling. The prevalence of impaired myocardial work indices was higher among patients with LV remodeling compared with patients without.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lustosa et al. (2020) conducted an observational in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) (n=600). Left ventricular remodeling vs. No left ventricular remodeling was evaluated on Global myocardial work index (p=<.001). Patients with left ventricular remodeling 3 months after STEMI had significantly more impaired global myocardial work index compared to those without remodeling (1,708 vs 1,979 mm Hg%; P<.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: