We have studied the performance of In <inf xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">1-x</inf> Ga <inf xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">x</inf> As <inf xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">y</inf> P <inf xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">1-y</inf> buried heterostructure (BH) 1.3-µm lasers in the microwave range. This study consisted of small-signal, large-signal, and digital pseudo-random word evaluation of these lasers. The small-signal study pointed out the impact of the oxide stripe capacitance on the laser response at microwave frequencies. The large-signal study uncovered basic laser non-linearities that affect the temporal response, spectral broadening, and wavelength chirp. Finally, digital pseudo-random word tests performed at 1.7 Gbit/s indicated that in spite of these inherent laser nonlinearities, the 1.3-µm BH lasers performed well enough to be considered as promising sources for gigabit optical communication systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hakki et al. (1985) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: