Key result
Synthetic ECV without blood sampling correlates well with conventional ECV despite lingering accuracy questions.
Why the study?
Conventional CMR myocardial ECV calculation requires blood sampling for haematocrit within 24 hours of the scan, limiting clinical applicability, while the accuracy of proposed bloodless synthetic ECV methods remains questionable.
Does synthetic ECV calculation by CMR without blood sampling accurately estimate conventional ECV?
Meta-Analysis
Does synthetic ECV calculation by CMR without blood sampling accurately estimate conventional ECV?
Synthetic ECV can provide a non-invasive quantitative measurement of the myocardium's extracellular space when timely haematocrit measurements are not available, particularly when large alterations in ECV are expected.
Facilitates ECV assessment without blood sampling in CMR; confirms correlation but leaves accuracy for routine use open.
Aims Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) T1 relaxation time mapping is an established technique primarily used to identify diffuse interstitial fibrosis and oedema. The myocardial extracellular volume (ECV) can be calculated from pre- and post-contrast T1 relaxation times and is a reproducible parametric index of the proportion of volume occupied by non-cardiomyocyte components in myocardial tissue. The conventional calculation of the ECV requires blood sampling to measure the haematocrit (HCT). Given the high variability of the HCT, the blood collection is recommended within 24 h of the CMR scan, limiting its applicability and posing a barrier to the clinical routine use of ECV measurements. In recent years, several research groups have proposed a method to determine the ECV by CMR without blood sampling. This is based on the inverse relationship between the T1 relaxation rate (R1) of blood and the HCT. Consequently, a ‘synthetic’ HCT could be estimated from the native blood R1, avoiding blood sampling. Methods and results We performed a review and meta-analysis of published studies on synthetic ECV, as well as a secondary analysis of previously published data to examine the effect of the chosen regression modell on bias. While, overall, a good correlation and little bias between synthetic and conventional ECV were found in these studies, questions regarding its accuracy remain. Conclusion Synthetic HCT and ECV can provide a ‘non-invasive’ quantitative measurement of the myocardium’s extracellular space when timely HCT measurements are not available and large alterations in ECV are expected, such as in cardiac amyloidosis. Due to the dependency of T1 relaxation times on the local setup, calculation of local formulas using linear regression is recommended, which can be easily performed using available data.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2023) conducted a meta-analysis in Myocardial extracellular volume quantification. Synthetic myocardial extracellular volume (ECV) calculation vs. Conventional ECV calculation with blood sampling was evaluated on Correlation and bias between synthetic and conventional ECV. Synthetic myocardial extracellular volume calculation without blood sampling showed good correlation and little bias compared to conventional ECV, though accuracy questions remain.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: