Why the study?
Systemic arterial hypertension is a leading cause of ESKD, warranting an evaluation of the pharmacological properties and renal protective effects of the third-generation CCB lercanidipine alone or combined with enalapril.
Does lercanidipine improve renal protection and reduce proteinuria in hypertensive patients at risk of renal impairment?
Does lercanidipine improve renal protection and reduce proteinuria in hypertensive patients at risk of renal impairment?
Lercanidipine, a third-generation calcium channel blocker, offers unique renal protective effects by dilating both afferent and efferent glomerular arterioles, making it a preferred choice for hypertensive patients at risk of renal impairment.
May support evaluation for proteinuria in hypertension; leaves open confirmation in randomized trials.
Systemic arterial hypertension is the second most common cause of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). Renal protection activity has been demonstrated for angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), gliflozins (dapagliflozin ed empagliflozin) and by the third-generation calcium channel blockers (CCB). Lercanidipine, a third-generation calcium channel blocker, has been shown to have a unique pharmacological and clinical profile, which translates into favorable renal hemodynamic changes. Here we summarized the pharmacological properties of lercanidipine and evaluate its ability to reduce proteinuria and preserve renal function when used as monotherapy or in combination with the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor enalapril. The fixed-dose combination lercanidipine/enalapril showed an excellent pharmacological profile with demonstrated clinical efficacy and tolerability in high-risk patients. Lercanidipine can be considered the preferred choice among calcium channel blocker drugs for the treatment of hypertensive patients at risk of renal impairment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ferri et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: