Why the study?
Rapid evolution of transcatheter technologies and surgical advances created an imperative to establish provider, institutional, and systems-based standards for high-quality valvular heart disease care.
This multisociety expert consensus document outlines the necessary systems of care, including multidisciplinary teams and specialized valve centers, to ensure high-quality care and optimal outcomes for patients with valvular heart disease.
This statement was commissioned as a Multisociety Expert Consensus Systems of Care Document by the American Association for Thoracic Surgery (AATS), American College of Cardiology (ACC), American Society of Echocardiography (ASE), Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI), and Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS). Expert Consensus Systems of Care Documents are intended to summarize the position of these partnering organizations on the availability, delivery, organization, and quality of cardiovascular care, with the intention of establishing appropriate benchmarks. These Systems of Care Documents are overseen by the ACC Task Force on Health Policy Statements and Systems of Care. With the rapid evolution and dissemination of transcatheter technologies, as well as advances in surgical repair and valve replacement techniques, there is an imperative for the cardiovascular community to establish the provider, institutional, and systems-based standards for delivery of high-quality valvular heart disease (VHD) care. The AATS, ACC, ASE, SCAI, and STS have, therefore, joined together to provide expert consensus and, wherever feasible, evidence-based recommendations for systems of care related to VHD, in the spirit of ensuring access to quality outcomes. The writing group anticipates that future updates to this consensus statement will be necessary as newer imaging and treatment technologies become available and more data are generated regarding patient outcomes, cost, and cost-effectiveness. Dharam J. Kumbhani, MD, SM, FACC. Chair, ACC Task Force on Health Policy Statements and Systems of Care. In the past decade, the evaluation and management of patients with VHD has changed dramatically. Advances in noninvasive imaging have enabled reliable, reproducible, and objective measurements of valve disease severity, along with an appreciation of any associated hemodynamic and structural consequences. There is enhanced understanding of the natural history of VHD based upon longitudinal studies of large numbers of patients that have correlated outcomes with noninvasive measurements as well as with data obtained during exercise testing. Advances in surgical techniques, especially those associated with valve repair; improved operative results; and perioperative management strategies have contributed substantially to better patient outcomes. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has revolutionized the treatment of patients with symptomatic, severe aortic stenosis (AS) and now provides a less-invasive treatment option for many eligible patients. Transcatheter repair of mitral regurgitation (MR) with an edge-to-edge clip device occupies a specific treatment niche currently, and more options for this valve lesion are anticipated in the near future. Transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) is the subject of intense investigation, and tricuspid valve interventions in high-surgical-risk patients are being developed. Collectively, these advances have led to an increasing number of treatment options, lower thresholds for and earlier timing of intervention, and the provision of less-invasive therapies to an older, sicker, and more frail population.1, 2 As the number and complexity of VHD treatment options have expanded, expert clinical judgment from an experienced multidisciplinary team (MDT) has assumed increasing importance. The number of patients with significant VHD who could benefit from appropriate intervention increases as a function of age. The elderly are the fastest growing segment of the U.S. population. Estimates of the prevalence of moderate or severe aortic or mitral disease in U.S. patients the of and The prevalence of moderate or severe VHD in a community of patients in the with a The number of patients who will be eligible for is to the of treatment strategies for patients with VHD will a of the to appropriate care is as the complexity and of and treatment to will be for to provide the of and clinical necessary to care for the of patients with VHD, ensuring the outcomes. care to patients with VHD is an with and the and appropriate timing of for evaluation and and In the intervention for VHD was the of severe is now that the of VHD to in patient heart quality of and be by earlier studies that of patients with severe VHD who for intervention or in There are an increasing number of treatment options available to patients with patients are of or have access to the of patients with severe for is that mitral valve repair is to mitral valve repair for and repair for have there that many patients with to repair valve with related to and the of valve patients with severe as well as be that be eligible for to the of a of care that to access with treatment options being be surgical aortic valve replacement in with aortic or be a better and be of specific or or outcomes. less-invasive for be as of and for surgical and the for to with a of and a more The of this is to a of care for patients with VHD, the of be to outcomes for patients and the care of VHD This is intended to the of patients with VHD and as in the for the of With and the of the for the of With is intended to the of and of care, and the for in of and for outcomes to benchmarks. The standards for the and function of valve as well as of care, those in a Expert Consensus Systems of Care and and for Transcatheter of and the access and quality outcomes. The for with the to more care is is that patients and be of the quality of care in in VHD patient care is to and with outcomes and outcomes to those with or large systems to the management of patients with VHD could care in a to those for the management of and surgical as and outcomes. the of in this the of of valve and valve the of be by objective The is to the number of to and quality for a valve to to be or in a that be more objective The in a be to the care of the patient by ensuring access to the care in the the and and This be to the who the of VHD, to the care for and to the the of of care patients to be for the appropriate of care and a on and with VHD be of treatment options, those or and be the to to and The and to establishing a of care are the dissemination of care on the of outcomes that to patients an of VHD and natural the of patient and the of available treatment options is of and and treatment to the in and a of appreciation of the in outcomes in patients or frail for is the of and valve to provide and for the appropriate management of VHD patients and to any of the for the of with and of the for the of With are a for the care In there are ACC to provide and for VHD patient and the and Care The of care the with community and valve and with a patient a be on the to the complexity of disease with the appropriate a on patients and there are patients with who benefit from to the of VHD care. with severe have valve that surgical repair as or or or The to on an patient with severe and and function is and on the of a repair in the of an experienced mitral in with imaging In the management of the of mitral valve to that are The management of patients with be in the of the appropriate of care an has become available in in the there as many that access to to operative intervention, to a or who are for benefit from access techniques, be available is that the of The of aortic valve in patients operative is in patients who in outcomes. The to aortic valve valve and for is the for a of care that patients to the appropriate is that as VHD have of and patients to evidence-based The and the valve are for standards and and is for these is a of the quality and be available to and The ACC the in The was a multidisciplinary to the of and in the care of patients with VHD and a of the in and surgical and in the of and of the and for and and of and patient as well as systems of care from The for the of patients with VHD access to an of care delivery, ensuring quality and and on outcomes. As a of these a writing was to a the and of an of care for VHD patients. The writing was of from the AATS, ACC, ASE, SCAI, and and systems of care for the treatment of segment and by the of the the of that to the the writing to recommendations for and and This was upon the for the of with and as well as ACC the ACC Expert Consensus for Transcatheter the ACC Expert Consensus for the for the of With and the Expert Consensus Systems of Care and and for Transcatheter The was based on the and outcomes. The and of a of care for VHD patients the patient access to and the to outcomes cost, and any consequences. The of the writing was by the to this of the writing and by and was with ACC and expert by the ACC was to of this was for by the ACC Policy the the of the of and the STS of the of and systems of care in of have and in the and large U.S. a the of a a as and of for a are available in of for and and for is in of and is an and of care. These systems with to and a this on of care, there is to the by the care who are for and of patients with American Society of Surgery American College of Surgeons American College of Cardiology American Association The U.S. in by the of with the objective of and there are by the in the quality of care and the outcomes of patients with the American College of Surgeons a statement in of with and by an a of in patients could be to a with the available of expert The of this of has associated with improved patient outcomes in and by the outcomes by the of the and the of multidisciplinary The has the of and and of This the for of on the organizations and Health Care have to the and to patients with in surgical outcomes the American Society of Surgery and the American College of Surgeons to of to care and high-quality management of patients to in an that was to that quality are patients with cardiovascular the of to and the treatment and outcomes of patients with in to the that the provision of care, for patients with cardiovascular have in the Health heart disease care has of care, from to surgical have to provide of care to patient In the heart disease as well as have upon The Society of Cardiology has a position on heart valve that evaluation and care for patients with VHD by in The have access to high-quality care to of a that as quality for for and improved of in appropriate patients with improved and for patients improved and outcomes in patients with and objective and patient with appropriate of care and a a of care for of in are by a significant VHD is or patients be to a or cardiovascular for evaluation and The of the care in VHD for care, and establishing patient be is that for care be appropriate for patients. for patient that and be As the of to VHD to and as surgical and treatment options to the care increasing systems have improved the of and care the of imaging data has of a of care for VHD be access to data of any imaging This access appropriate patient the for and provide a to on The of during by to the for a more and to a on noninvasive imaging be The for a VHD of care is in have the and to and and surgical have imaging that be available a have, a the and to and surgical as The to a mitral valve repair in patients with to is for a to be as a valve are the the standards and outcomes as a be the from of care for and and the of and of care of patients the is of importance. The of the provide recommendations for and in and outcomes. of and and of the and function of the in and of a of the number of and and 2 the institutional, and for the of valve be are that are in 2 be of benefit to of patients with The in the of and of expert available the and and have the in necessary for and These hemodynamic of VHD, and intervention, and and for the a and of be to and and be in and and of and for and access of Collectively, these provide necessary for valve and the valve related to patient of the natural history of VHD, timing for appropriate judgment anticipated and of an intervention, and the to the appropriate for a specific These have the and to in with patients and The for and are in and be to a and aortic valve have the and to and The and a be to the of related to for aortic and mitral be available a a be in transcatheter mitral valve repair the edge-to-edge as well as mitral of be by the be by the as and transcatheter mitral valve transcatheter mitral valve and tricuspid valve are will be a in device a that be a the quality and be and are to with or have the and for more surgical to of patients with The benefit of these and The of the as well as and be to and clinical care and to clinical VHD patients. surgical is to aortic valve replacement and the surgical and to patients with In patients with who have a the of is necessary to to for be available for patients with repair of mitral valve repair for the for and be the of be a on the of surgical and imaging and mitral valve replacement be available and repair of tricuspid regurgitation is a to mitral repair in appropriate patients. The evaluation and surgical management or of with or be and, for be more appropriate a tricuspid repair to mitral valve valve for valve and are better for a high-quality imaging and are to and for patients with of the and of VHD is the in an with in valve an understanding of in valve lesion of lesion evaluation of of and for and surgical and of is the imaging for VHD, and has become an for appropriate of transcatheter imaging is to lesion and and are measurements of and access are As treatment options for VHD, a of is a of with clinical and management the of have become to the of any especially The is a in valve transcatheter mitral valve repair and repair of in this an who has in these and is with the and is to provide with imaging for transcatheter or the of transcatheter and delivery is with and the treatment of transcatheter valve is that imaging be available and these imaging and have the and to and are in Cardiovascular imaging provide in are and outcomes by the provision of appropriate and the of with this an in to cardiovascular as heart and have a of with in patients with VHD, a valve There be a and that patients the with to and have and surgical who are and to provide care to patients with VHD, as well as numbers of and with in valve patients with heart to and a heart be of the on the of the and in and an in the and care of patients. of the care team could care and and have an care for a for and the to provide The have access to in as heart and heart and and surgical and mitral and tricuspid transcatheter a have a with high-quality hemodynamic an number of and and for and to a device is for a as in significant and hemodynamic a is to provide a for and with and care The and for and are in The a in the and treatment of patients with of the team a and that is to patient outcomes. the and specific of and these are to in any The of the is in and The to the of imaging and consensus on patient management outcomes, and The and be this the and of the group and to more and evidence-based patients with heart to and a heart is to that has to of of the as from and be as for that a patient be with or with these provide a for from team provides the to or The is with outcomes, and be these and the and management for patient be of these is to the with patients in and to a regarding of the function together during the of surgical and of the and for VHD that the of a or of The for these be the of team and as to and outcomes. The and data and an to and outcomes In a and be to outcomes, provide in a team and as a to quality be and be of for management to are to in the of the and STS to and a patient and more rapid dissemination of and to and a for and quality to quality is in the with to the of that and valve any to the and will of a and valve This will in quality and a and that data for and with of on and to will be surgical in the STS or surgical that outcomes is there are the for in surgical these be by and is for of outcomes and establishing benchmarks. the STS Surgery and the Transcatheter to in the STS who data thresholds are in the for and will be eligible to a or in in a valve was a of of the by the for and have to data and of any in the is now with of a and for the is a the of are The is with being will be that and be by is that heart valve will these data and be to technologies and clinical management of patients with and studies will be appropriate for in device will be for and there is an There many clinical that will be by that have a significant on the treatment of patients with VHD, be by or to many by of of or data The of in outcomes and will to be be to the and STS data as as data could be to the and STS be to provide a for that with improved lower cost, and of the and provide to and is that the to and There be on the and of the valve and with to provide on and establish a understanding of patients with VHD for more care, as well as of the team for is to patients and to and and of for patients with VHD is of the VHD and the timing of strategies be to with and In to valve regarding VHD is the of device imaging and the to have to the is now to more in are to be and who have in the of transcatheter valve will to to a for on the and of intervention, as well as related to patient evaluation and the timing of The have the to provide and to the in VHD and be of as a heart be for by and heart and are to more and device or The of evaluation and treatment options for patients with VHD and This has for the of and There to be a of VHD who the of VHD and are to patients and is the of this to in to have in VHD, is that of these will provide The delivery of high-quality care the to data regarding the number of patients and outcomes. of data as the for of and and of in and outcomes. to has the of standards The and are to and will be by the valve from systems of VHD care regarding and of care, be an The of quality is to any of VHD care. The of data and the to outcomes to for the of patient the from data to and objective based on benchmarks. quality of care and for VHD a and to the appropriate data on with an and and that the of The data are on surgical and transcatheter valve for the of VHD the there is a to more the quality of care in VHD patients in a that is and on more and VHD is a and the care of these patients quality be or of significant VHD, of disease severity, timing of a valve and and in the of the VHD has a more the the care of VHD patients is in and and of and and and These in quality of care in to be as in outcomes. The that the for quality standards are patient and, be that there are significant to and and of surgical and transcatheter provides a outcomes, the and are to a There are associated with of data the is during the is that this is a with in an elderly patient In that there was a for improved outcomes in the are in the Expert Consensus Systems of Care and for Transcatheter The that outcomes will with are the for a for many there are as that are and more with and for there be as a recommendations be and any of are as VHD thresholds are to with there is a for standards care and quality with the of of and as to better with The recommendations is to to as in the of that are of outcomes the quality of care and are more are large to The that the heart valve be and available outcomes for The thresholds for and be based on the of the number of by valve the with available data on the number of to be an for outcomes. of the and outcomes is in and from an and any from the The of and to of In the with outcomes, The with outcomes, for be to and to In in or outcomes is with these are be that the number of that as moderate to on the of is the as the necessary to of of data The lower and with lower to or and that are to outcomes, as in the The to outcomes as The there is regarding the of and outcomes are and to with increasing and As technologies are and patients become eligible for the the in this be in to from and The writing the in the of The a as lower a with a on with the of these the from a have is to from this the is of a In the with and that of are more reliable, to be more with for the of a data is to provide more and better in outcomes. with the quality as that is for on the of the of the of for patients. is by the the of the or the of to newer with of to be in or for quality are a to the of of provide and there could be a for or to a number of of outcomes is the outcomes be on a as and and in outcomes be with to clinical of will be to and of outcomes. The the outcomes that be on the of available for and mitral valve In the will the number of for these This will the for future as are and clinical The for to of care that on and These and as well as of and a to is now available for patients and for patients. The of care for these patients with those for high-surgical-risk to for there is a to in and or a and to for patients. These data be the of patients by the valve and outcomes to these and outcomes of quality for a in the Expert Consensus Systems of Care and for Transcatheter These are the of an evolution in that the of and of As in and any valve with an that the for have a quality that an is to the of to and outcomes the in is anticipated that will number of to the of patients for and of for and of the U.S. population. have outcomes, a will for to have outcomes, a will quality in the STS to outcomes STS or for and in during the for to mitral valve repair is a that quality has that the and of mitral valve repair are to replacement in patients with severe patients with severe surgical repair is a and repair with an operative be a 2 The treatment options for severe be by an with repair these standards be from that is associated with repair for with an improved and in mitral are In mitral valve repair with of mitral an in mitral with mitral valve repair for this as a an appropriate for and surgical for mitral valve be or data from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons a repair well for disease in more a on the of expert consensus and is that a valve that and a surgical mitral valve repair of for patients with in the of of the or In these the operative be This quality to valve that are mitral valve for this is anticipated that surgical mitral valve repair to those that are or more experienced a be to repair of more as In valve to the of surgical for to that repair thresholds are or mitral valve repair to a surgical are associated with repair and improved data the of to an expert who more in a valve The has a to the outcomes and quality a valve The U.S. is and by and systems be with a to and of of data be in the of data quality and of of outcomes is an and that is by of a to a VHD a that of In the surgical STS has a is to a of VHD will to in to outcomes. of in the outcomes There is that those that have better outcomes those that the regarding this is In has that the have as The of is the of the of in by and with a in the prevalence of and and patients experienced a in a In the in the is that outcomes be to and as of STS to and the of or heart and The STS in and now outcomes for and The Society has to outcomes for mitral valve mitral valve and mitral valve replacement or repair The data are the STS and this to the and a was This was based on a to the of a or on of mitral and mitral for based on these is being in that the is better for with to the of STS for the is that and will outcomes of and transcatheter valve interventions the are In to outcomes, is for patients and regarding of patients and in this The increasing of VHD, with the of improved imaging techniques, better surgical outcomes, and transcatheter has regarding strategies for care The of this is to there are or the number of valve to a regarding a of care for patients with VHD that for the in valve and a more delivery to access to high-quality care a and that is the of the in and is This and standards for and There are with to the associated with the of interventions and of in surgical for and of care, be The of clinical has enhanced to and standards and is now The has a for that VHD and a will be These will and There is a of to the of this to the of patients and the many American Association for Thoracic MD, of American College of MD, J. MD, and Policy and Policy and and American Society of MD, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and MD, Documents The Society of Thoracic MD, and or of that as a of or the writing of the writing as well as of the are to those of the writing The ACC Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents these to or in that to the on this a writing is to a of with with led by a with is on and as to this is in the and is in to to this available for the ACC Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents is available as is the ACC for This the and that this of for is available
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nishimura et al. (2019) conducted a review in Valvular heart disease. Systems of care was evaluated. This multisociety expert consensus document establishes provider, institutional, and systems-based standards for the delivery of high-quality care for patients with valvular heart disease.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: