Key result
Cohort characterizes baseline features in 206 patients evaluated for suspected immune checkpoint inhibitor myocarditis.
Cohort (n=206)
No
Uncovers pathogen profiles via metagenomic sequencing in cancer patients with suspected myocarditis, highlighting infectious assessments during checkpoint inhibitor toxicity.
Immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) improve survival of cancer patients but can cause fulminant myocarditis often part of a general systemic myotoxicity, being a rare yet potentially fatal immune-related adverse event.1–4 Whether occult infection (e.g. viral or bacterial) contributes to ICI-myocarditis (ICI-M) is unknown. We conducted a prospective, single-centre cohort (Pitié-Salpêtrière hospital, Paris, France; NCT05454527). Between 2019 and 2024, 256 patients were referred for suspected ICI-M. Cases were adjudicated as definite ICI-M or refuted–ICI-M using modified Bonaca criteria, as recently described.2,5,6 Of 231 patients with a final diagnosis, blood/endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) derived metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS)7 was missing in 25 (11%) because no sample was drawn (refusal, death before sampling) or owing to technical failure, leaving 206 patients (110 definite ICI-M, 96 non-ICI-M) for analysis (flow chart in Figure 1). Cancers (64% male, median age 72 years IQR [60–78]) were mainly lung or pleural (27%), cutaneous (26%), and kidney or urothelial (22%); 72% had metastatic disease and ≈78% received PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy, of which almost half were combined with another anti-cancer class. The upper limit of normal (ULN) for high-sensitivity cardiac troponin-T (cTnT) was 14 ng/L.6
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lorca et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Suspected immune checkpoint inhibitor myocarditis (n=206). Occult infection evaluated by metagenomic next-generation sequencing was evaluated. The abstract describes the baseline characteristics of 206 patients evaluated for suspected immune checkpoint inhibitor myocarditis but does not report the primary study results.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: