Key result
The Cockcroft-Gault equation estimated a significantly higher glomerular filtration rate (mean difference 3.78 units) compared to the MDRD equation in CKD patients with diabetes and hypertension.
Why the study?
To compare the performance of Cockcroft-Gault and Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) equations in estimating kidney function in CKD patients with diabetes and hypertension.
Does the Cockcroft-Gault equation differ from the MDRD equation in estimating kidney function in CKD patients with diabetes and hypertension?
Observational (n=81)
No
Does the Cockcroft-Gault equation differ from the MDRD equation in estimating kidney function in CKD patients with diabetes and hypertension?
Effect estimate: Mean difference 3.78
Absolute Event Rate: 18.94% vs 13.6%
p-value: p=<0.001
The Cockcroft-Gault and MDRD equations yield significantly different eGFR values in CKD patients with diabetes and hypertension, leading to different CKD staging in 22% of patients.
Equation choice may alter staging and dosing in comorbid CKD; leaves open outcome impact and need for validation.
Objective: To compare the performance of Cockcroft-Gault and Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) equations in estimating kidney function in CKD patients with diabetes and hypertension. Methods: This study retrospectively reviewed medical records in Hospital Kajang. The GFR was calculated using Cockcroft-Gault and MDRD equations. Kappa Measure of Agreement was used to check the consistency of CKD staging. Wilcoxon signed-ranked tests and Bland-Altman plots were used to determine the difference of both equations. Spearman correlation was used to determine the correlation between blood pressure and blood sugar levels with eGFR. Results: Data pertaining to a total of 81 patients were extracted. Results showed 22% of the patients were staged differently (Kappa value = 0.644 [P<0.001]) and the majority of them moved down one CKD stage when MDRD equation was used instead of Cockcroft-Gault equation. Wilcoxon signed rank test demonstrated there was a significant difference (P<0.001) in eGFR using CandG and MDRD in patients with diabetes and hypertension. Furthermore, the mean difference observed was 3.78±5.56 [P<0.001]), where the Cockcroft-Gault equation measured 3.78 units higher than MDRD equation. However, the relationship between blood sugar and blood pressure with eGFR were not significant. Conclusion: There was a significant difference between Cockcroft-Gault and MDRD equations in estimating kidney function CKD patients with diabetes and hypertension.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Paneerselvam et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Chronic kidney disease with diabetes and hypertension (n=81). Cockcroft-Gault equation vs. MDRD equation was evaluated on Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (Mean difference 3.78, p=<0.001). The Cockcroft-Gault equation estimated a significantly higher glomerular filtration rate (mean difference 3.78 units) compared to the MDRD equation in CKD patients with diabetes and hypertension.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: