Key result
Estimating renal function with the Cockcroft-Gault versus MDRD4 equations led to different dosage adjustment recommendations in 145 of 222 prescriptions, despite strong correlation (r=0.83, p<0.001).
Why the study?
Does the choice of equation (Cockcroft-Gault vs MDRD4) for estimating renal function affect dose recommendations for potentially nephrotoxic drugs in patients with chronic renal illness?
Cross-Sectional (n=249)
Does the choice of equation (Cockcroft-Gault vs MDRD4) for estimating renal function affect dose recommendations for potentially nephrotoxic drugs in patients with chronic renal illness?
Effect estimate: Pearson's r=0.83
p-value: p=<0.001
Although Cockcroft-Gault and MDRD4 equations correlate well statistically, their use leads to noticeable differences in drug dose recommendations for potentially nephrotoxic drugs.
Equation choice alters dosing recommendations; leaves open which equation optimizes safety pending outcome data.
Objective To evaluate the similarity (or not) of the dose recommendations according to the Cockcroft–Gault and MDRD4 (modified diet in renal disease) equations. Method A cross-sectional comparative observational test of patients suffering chronic renal illness that involved treatment using nephrotoxic drugs, admitted consecutively to the internal medicine department over a period of 6 months. The glomerular filtrate rate was calculated upon admission and at discharge using the Cockcroft–Gault and MDRD4 formulas. Grading of the disease for patients and dose adjustment recommendations of potentially nephrotoxic drugs was compared. The degree of correlation between the results obtained with both equations was assessed by means of the Pearson9s coefficient (r), considering p<0.05 as significant. Results Among the 249 patients included in the study, the staging of the disease was modified in 166 and the recommended dosage would have differed in 56.0% of these. Of the 222 prescriptions of potentially nephrotoxic drugs, 145 dosage adjustment recommendations would have differed. Glomerular filtrate rates were always less when the Cockcroft–Gault equation was used, although they were closely correlated both upon admission and discharge (Pearson9s r=0.83 and 0.81, respectively, p<0.001). Conclusions Although the Cockcroft–Gault and MDRD4 equations were statistically well correlated, differences in drug dose recommendations were noticeable.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cabello-Muriel et al. (2014) conducted a cross-sectional in Chronic renal illness (n=249). Cockcroft-Gault equation vs. MDRD4 equation was evaluated on Degree of correlation between glomerular filtrate rates and similarity of dose recommendations (Pearson's r=0.83, p=<0.001). Estimating renal function with the Cockcroft-Gault versus MDRD4 equations led to different dosage adjustment recommendations in 145 of 222 prescriptions, despite strong correlation (r=0.83, p<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: