Key result
Compressed sensing cine CMR yields global circumferential strain measurements comparable to conventional cine CMR.
Why the study?
Compressed sensing drastically reduces cine CMR acquisition time, but its effects on feature tracking strain analysis required investigation.
Does compressed sensing cine CMR provide comparable global circumferential strain assessment to conventional cine CMR in patients with LV pathologies?
Comparison
Prospective CS cine CMR vs retrospective conventional cine CMR
Design
Comparative imaging study
Authors
Loading...
May support faster CMR strain protocols in LV disease; leaves open prospective validation before routine use.
Observational (n=65)
No
Does compressed sensing cine CMR provide comparable global circumferential strain assessment to conventional cine CMR in patients with LV pathologies?
Absolute Event Rate: -17.1% vs -16.1%
p-value: p=0.508
Compressed sensing cine CMR provides comparable global circumferential strain assessment to conventional cine CMR, supporting the clinical utility of high-speed CMR imaging.
Kido et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Left ventricular pathologies (n=65). Compressed sensing (CS) cine CMR vs. Conventional cine CMR was evaluated on Global circumferential strain (GCS) (p=0.508). Compressed sensing cine CMR yielded global circumferential strain measurements comparable to conventional cine CMR (-17.1% vs -16.1%, p=0.508), demonstrating excellent agreement.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: