Key result
Dipstick proteinuria linked to ~47% higher risk of cardiac death or HF rehospitalization.
Why the study?
The semiquantitative urine dipstick test is simple and widely accessible, but the prognostic significance of dipstick proteinuria in patients with HFpEF was unclear.
Does the presence of dipstick proteinuria predict the composite of cardiac death or HF rehospitalisation in patients with HFpEF?
Observational (n=851)
Yes
Does the presence of dipstick proteinuria predict the composite of cardiac death or HF rehospitalisation in patients with HFpEF?
Dipstick proteinuria is a simple and useful prognostic marker for predicting adverse outcomes in patients with HFpEF.
May support dipstick proteinuria for risk stratification in HFpEF; leaves open need for prospective validation before clinical use.
Objective The semiquantitative urine dipstick test is a simple and convenient method that is available in the smallest community-based healthcare clinics. We sought to clarify the prognostic significance of dipstick proteinuria in patients with heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Design A P rospective m U lticente R ob S ervational st U dy of pat I en T s with H eart F ailure with p reserved E jection F raction (PURSUIT-HFpEF) registry. Participants and setting We assessed 851 discharged-alive patients in the PURSUIT-HFpEF registry who were initially hospitalised due to an acute decompensated HFpEF (EF≥50%) and elevated N-terminal-pro-brain natriuretic peptide (≥400 ng/L) at Osaka University Hospital and other 30 affiliated hospitals in the Kansai region of Japan. Patients received a urine dipstick test, and were divided into two groups according to the absence or presence of proteinuria. A trace or more of dipstick proteinuria was defined as the presence of proteinuria. Main outcome measures A composite of cardiac death or HF rehospitalisation. Results Median age was 83 years and 473 patients (55.6%) were female. Five hundred and two patients (59%) were proteinuria (−) and 349 patients (41%) were proteinuria (+). The composite endpoint and HF rehospitalisation occurred more often in proteinuria (+) individuals than proteinuria (−) individuals (log-rank p=0.006 and p=0.007, respectively); but cardiac death did not (log-rank p=0.139). Multivariable Cox regression analysis showed that the presence of proteinuria was associated with the composite endpoint (HR: 1.47, 95% CI 1.07 to 2.01, p=0.016), and HF rehospitalisation (HR: 1.48, 95% CI 1.07 to 2.05, p=0.020), but not with cardiac death (HR: 1.52, 95% CI 0.83 to 2.76, p=0.172). Conclusions Dipstick proteinuria may be a prognostic marker in patients with HFpEF. Evaluation of proteinuria by a urine dipstick test may be a simple but useful method for risk stratification in HFpEF. UMIN-CTR ID UMIN000021831.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Oeun et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) (n=851). Dipstick proteinuria (trace or more) vs. Absence of proteinuria was evaluated on Composite of cardiac death or HF rehospitalisation (HR 1.47, 95% CI 1.07 to 2.01, p=0.016). The presence of dipstick proteinuria was associated with an increased risk of the composite of cardiac death or HF rehospitalization (HR 1.47; 95% CI 1.07 to 2.01; p=0.016).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: