PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 1, 1976The Journal of Physiology665 citationsOpen Access

Directional differences of impulse spread in trabecular muscle from mammalian heart.

View Full Paper
LCLe Clerc

Key Result

The disparity in conduction velocity (ratio of 3.0 for longitudinal to transverse) could be explained by differences in the resistivity of intracellular and extracellular paths for current flow.

Structured PICO

P
Population
Trabecular bundles from the right ventricle of calf hearts
I
Intervention
Application of longitudinal current
C
Comparator
Application of transverse current
O
Outcome
Electrical properties including conduction velocity and intra- and extracellular resistancesurrogate

The disparity in conduction velocity between longitudinal and transverse directions in calf trabecular muscle can be explained by differences in resistivity of intra- and extracellular paths, confirming theoretical predictions.

Abstract

Trabecular bundles from the right ventricle of calf hearts were used. Electrical properties measured by the application of longitudinal current were compared to those measured by the application of transverse current. 2. The following data were obtained on the basis of classical cable analysis: (i) a ratio of 3-0 for longitudinal to transverse conduction velocity, (ii) a ratio of 3-6 for intra- to extracellular longitudinal resistance, (iii) a ratio of 12-6 for intra- to extracellular transverse resistance, (iv) a ratio of 9-4 for intracellular transverse to intracellular longitudinal resistance, (v) a ratio of 2-7 for the extracellular transverse to the extracellular longitudinal resistance. 3. The disparity in conduction velocity could be explained on the sole grounds of differences in the resistivity of the intracellular and extracellular paths for current flow in the two directions, confirming theoretical predictions. 4. The value of the transverse internal resistance can be accounted for on the ground of frequent branching in a three-dimensional network. There is no need to make the additional assumption of current flow through lateral low resistance pathways between parallel fibres.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Le Clerc (1976) studied Normal physiology. Application of longitudinal current vs. Application of transverse current was evaluated on Electrical properties (conduction velocity and resistance ratios). The disparity in conduction velocity (ratio of 3.0 for longitudinal to transverse) could be explained by differences in the resistivity of intracellular and extracellular paths for current flow.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0eaf0d8da6dd046147a4dfhttps://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1976.sp011283
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Directional Difference of Conduction Velocity in the Cardiac Ventricular Syncytium Studied by Microelectrodes1959 · 161 citations
  2. 2The diffusion of radiopotassium across intercalated disks of mammalian cardiac muscle1966 · 306 citations
  3. 3CARDIAC MUSCLE1968 · 335 citations
  4. 4Spread of Electrical Activity Through the Wall of the Ventricle1953 · 129 citations
  5. 5Total Excitation of the Isolated Human Heart1970 · 1,790 citations