Key result
Advancing CIED technologies demand continuous perioperative management education for anesthesia teams.
Continuous education of anesthesia teams is required for the perioperative management of increasingly complex cardiac implantable electronic devices to mitigate risks like electromagnetic interference.
Anesthesia teams require ongoing CIED education to mitigate perioperative risks; leaves open standardized protocols amid evolving technologies.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) frequently undergo various surgical procedures and in the past perioperative management involved only placing magnet over the device. New programming features, development of implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD), cardiac resynchronization therapy, and increasing complexity of the operating room equipment have led to new sources of electromagnetic interference (EMI). A comprehensive understanding of the CIED is necessary to provide a timely and optimal care to the patients. RECENT FINDINGS: Technological advancements and direct implantation of the transvenous implantable cardiac defibrillators into the heart have led to less clear lines between the pacemakers and the ICD. Subcutaneous ICD as well as the leadless transcatheter deployed intracardiac pacemaker development has complicated the issue further. SUMMARY: Rapidly developing technologies and increasing number of patients with these devices coming for noncardiac surgeries necessitate continuous education of the anesthesia team regarding perioperative management of such devices.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Arora et al. (2017) conducted a review in Patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) undergoing surgical procedures. Perioperative management of CIEDs was evaluated. Rapidly developing technologies and increasing numbers of patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices necessitate continuous education of the anesthesia team regarding perioperative management.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: