Key result
Low-dose IV carperitide fails to reduce death and HF hospitalization compared to standard treatment.
Why the study?
The effects of low-dose carperitide on long-term clinical outcomes in patients with acute heart failure had not been fully elucidated.
Does low-dose intravenous carperitide reduce the composite of all-cause death and heart failure hospitalization in patients with acute heart failure?
RCT (n=247)
open-label
randomized
Yes
Does low-dose intravenous carperitide reduce the composite of all-cause death and heart failure hospitalization in patients with acute heart failure?
Effect estimate: hazard ratio 1.26 (95% CI 0.78-2.06)
Absolute Event Rate: 29.5% vs 28%
p-value: p=0.827
Low-dose intravenous carperitide added to standard treatment did not reduce long-term mortality or hospitalization in patients with acute heart failure, though the trial was underpowered due to premature termination.
Low-dose carperitide adds no long-term outcome benefit in acute heart failure; leaves open natriuretic peptide strategies pending adequately powered trials.
AIMS: The effects of low-dose carperitide on long-term clinical outcomes of patients with acute heart failure (AHF) have not yet been fully elucidated. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of low-dose intravenous carperitide on the long-term clinical outcomes of patients with AHF. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this multicentre, open-label, randomized controlled trial, 247 patients with AHF received low-dose carperitide intravenously with standard treatment or matching standard treatment for 72 h from November 2014 to March 2021 across nine sites in Japan. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause death and heart failure hospitalization within 2 years. The primary endpoint was observed in 36 of 122 patients (29.5%) and 35 of 125 patients (28.0%) in the carperitide group and standard treatment groups, respectively [hazard ratio 1.26; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.78-2.06, P = 0.827]. No significant differences were observed in the secondary endpoints, including cumulative urine volume at 72 h; change in the degree of dyspnoea over 72 h; and changes in brain natriuretic peptide, cystatin C, renin, aldosterone, and catecholamine levels at 72 h post-randomization between the groups. A greater decrease in the estimated glomerular filtration rate was observed in the carperitide group compared with the standard treatment group (inter-group difference -3.9 mL/min/1.73 m2; 95% CI -7.0 to -0.8). CONCLUSION: In patients with AHF, low-dose carperitide did not reduce long-term mortality or hospitalization events when combined with standard treatment. Because patient enrolment was terminated prematurely, the study was underpowered and inconclusive.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Honda et al. (2024) conducted an RCT in acute heart failure (AHF) (n=247). carperitide vs. standard treatment was evaluated on composite of all-cause death and heart failure hospitalization within 2 years (hazard ratio 1.26, 95% CI 0.78-2.06, p=0.827). Low-dose intravenous carperitide did not reduce the composite of all-cause death and heart failure hospitalization at 2 years compared to standard treatment (HR 1.26; 95% CI 0.78-2.06; P=0.827).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: