Key result
Atrio-biventricular pacing prolonged the QRS-interval (91 vs 56 ms, p<0.05) and decreased cardiac index compared to baseline, whereas high septal pacing preserved normal LV function.
Why the study?
Does high septal pacing compared to biventricular pacing preserve the normal contraction sequence and LV function in a porcine model?
Does high septal pacing compared to biventricular pacing preserve the normal contraction sequence and LV function in a porcine model?
Absolute Event Rate: 91% vs 56%
p-value: p=<0.05
High septal pacing preserves the natural sequential shortening pattern of the myocardial band and LV function compared to biventricular pacing in a porcine model.
High septal pacing may warrant exploration over biventricular pacing for LV preservation; leaves open translation from this porcine model to clinical practice.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of biventricular and high septal pacing on the normal contraction sequence of the helical ventricular myocardial band, and its impact on left ventricular function. METHODS: Ten pigs (25-68 kg) underwent analysis of percent segmental shortening (SS%) by sonomicrometry, with crystals placed along the fiber orientation of the ascending, descending segments, and posterior LV wall within the spatial geometry of the helical heart. Unipolar pacing electrodes stimulated the right atrium (RA) and either the right ventricular apex and left ventricular posterior wall (atrio-biventricular), or the proximal high septum (atrio-high septal). Systemic hemodynamics, QRS-interval, cardiac index (CI), systolic and diastolic LV functions and pressure-dimension loops (P-D) were analyzed and cardiac motion was monitored by video analysis. RESULTS: Pacing increased normal sinus heart rate (NSR) from 77+/-9 beats/min to 98+/-5 beats/min. Atrial pacing did not change the NSR hemodynamic variables. Conversely, atrio-biventricular pacing prolonged the QRS-interval (91+/-14 ms vs 56+/-11 ms at baseline, p<0.05) and decreased mean arterial pressure (50+/-4 mmHg vs 58+/-12 mmHg), CI (3.4+/-0.3 L/(min m2) vs 4.0+/-0.8 L/(min m2)) and PRSW (71+/-25%) compared to NSR (p<0.05). Furthermore, atrio-biventricular pacing decreased SS% in all segments, especially at the LV posterior wall (71% of baseline, p<0.05), and disrupted the NSR shortening sequence (progression from descending to posterior to ascending regions). Changes were characterized by premature stimulation of the posterior wall segment adjacent to the pacer stimulus, with associated (1) decrease of pressure-dimension loop area, (2) desynchronization of P-D loops and (3) consistent loss of the twisting pattern of visible cardiac motion. In contrast, atrio-high septal pacing restored systemic hemodynamics, LV systolic and diastolic functions to baseline values and preserved the normal sequence of shortening of the ventricular myocardial band. CONCLUSIONS: (1) Biventricular pacing disrupts of the natural sequence of shortening of the myocardial band and results in impaired LV function. (2) High septal pacing preserves the sequential shortening pattern of the myocardial band and LV function.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tomioka et al. (2006) studied this question. Atrio-high septal pacing vs. Atrio-biventricular pacing and normal sinus rhythm was evaluated on QRS-interval (p=<0.05). Atrio-biventricular pacing prolonged the QRS-interval (91 vs 56 ms, p<0.05) and decreased cardiac index compared to baseline, whereas high septal pacing preserved normal LV function.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: