Key result
Automated 12-lead ECG localizes LV activation in scar-related VT to within 10 mm.
Why the study?
To facilitate ablation of ventricular tachycardia, an automated localization system to identify the site of origin of left ventricular activation was developed, and its accuracy required prospective assessment.
Does an automated intraprocedural 12-lead ECG-based system accurately localize early left ventricular activation in patients undergoing ablation for scar-related VT?
Observational (n=19)
Does an automated intraprocedural 12-lead ECG-based system accurately localize early left ventricular activation in patients undergoing ablation for scar-related VT?
An automated 12-lead ECG-based localization system can accurately identify the site of origin of left ventricular activation within 10 mm during VT ablation.
May support intraprocedural VT localization; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before practice change.
BACKGROUND: To facilitate ablation of ventricular tachycardia (VT), an automated localization system to identify the site of origin of left ventricular activation in real time using the 12-lead ECG was developed. The objective of this study was to prospectively assess its accuracy. METHODS: The automated site of origin localization system consists of 3 steps: (1) localization of ventricular segment based on population templates, (2) population-based localization within a segment, and (3) patient-specific site localization. Localization error was assessed by the distance between the known reference site and the estimated site. RESULTS: In 19 patients undergoing 21 catheter ablation procedures of scar-related VT, site of origin localization accuracy was estimated using 552 left ventricular endocardial pacing sites pooled together and 25 VT-exit sites identified by contact mapping. For the 25 VT-exit sites, localization error of the population-based localization steps was within 10 mm. Patient-specific site localization achieved accuracy of within 3.5 mm after including up to 11 pacing (training) sites. Using 3 remotes (67.8±17.0 mm from the reference VT-exit site), and then 5 close pacing sites, resulted in localization error of 7.2±4.1 mm for the 25 identified VT-exit sites. In 2 emulated clinical procedure with 2 induced VTs, the site of origin localization system achieved accuracy within 4 mm. CONCLUSIONS: In this prospective validation study, the automated localization system achieved estimated accuracy within 10 mm and could thus provide clinical utility.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhou et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Scar-related ventricular tachycardia (n=19). Automated intraprocedural 12-lead ECG-based localization system vs. Contact mapping (known reference site) was evaluated on Localization error (distance between the known reference site and the estimated site). An automated 12-lead ECG-based system for localizing the site of origin of left ventricular activation in scar-related VT achieved an estimated accuracy within 10 mm.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: