Key result
Computer-assisted management of hypertension achieved a greater average reduction in diastolic pressure (21.7 vs 16.7 mm Hg) and lower dropout rates (37.5% vs 42.1%) compared to control.
Why the study?
Does computer-assisted management improve blood pressure control and follow-up retention in patients with hypertension in primary care?
RCT
Cluster randomized
Yes
Does computer-assisted management improve blood pressure control and follow-up retention in patients with hypertension in primary care?
Absolute Event Rate: 21.7% vs 16.7%
Computer-assisted management with physician feedback and patient reminders improves blood pressure control and follow-up retention in primary care hypertension management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Supports adoption of computer-assisted tools for hypertension in primary care; extends RCT evidence on digital interventions for BP control and retention.
McAlister et al. (1986) conducted an RCT in Hypertension. Computer assisted management vs. Standard care without computer feedback was evaluated on Average reduction of diastolic pressure in moderate hypertension. Computer-assisted management of hypertension achieved a greater average reduction in diastolic pressure (21.7 vs 16.7 mm Hg) and lower dropout rates (37.5% vs 42.1%) compared to control.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: