Key result
Patient-GP short-messages-based interaction did not significantly reduce the percentage of uncontrolled hypertensives at 6 months compared to routine paper recording (31.7% vs 35.6%; p=0.47).
Why the study?
Does patient-general practitioner short-messages-based interaction improve hypertension control in low-to-medium risk hypertensive patients?
Population
285 low-to-medium risk hypertensive patients in primary care
Comparison
Telemedicine-based system enabling… vs Recording data on paper and delivering it to the…
Design
RCT, randomized
Follow-up
six months
Authors
Loading...
SMS interaction does not improve hypertension control; challenges efficacy of basic digital tools and supports routine care in low-risk patients.
RCT (n=285)
Yes
Does patient-general practitioner short-messages-based interaction improve hypertension control in low-to-medium risk hypertensive patients?
Absolute Event Rate: 31.7% vs 35.6%
p-value: p=0.47
A short-messages-based interaction between patients and general practitioners did not significantly improve hypertension control compared to routine care in low-to-medium risk patients.
Carrasco et al. (2008) conducted an RCT in Hypertension (n=285). Patient-GP short-messages-based interaction vs. Paper recording delivered personally in routine visits was evaluated on Percentage of uncontrolled hypertensives at the final visit (p=0.47). Patient-GP short-messages-based interaction did not significantly reduce the percentage of uncontrolled hypertensives at 6 months compared to routine paper recording (31.7% vs 35.6%; p=0.47).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: