Key result
Female sex is not linked to a difference in AF ablation rates compared to males.
Why the study?
Women are less likely to undergo catheter ablation for AF despite having more symptoms, prompting investigation into whether referral patterns associate with this sex disparity.
Does female sex reduce referrals to specialists and utilization of catheter ablation in outpatients with newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation?
Cohort (n=5,445)
No
Does female sex reduce referrals to specialists and utilization of catheter ablation in outpatients with newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation?
Effect estimate: aOR 1.08 (95% CI 0.83-1.40)
Absolute Event Rate: 18.8% vs 20.4%
p-value: p=0.56
In a single-center cohort, there were no significant sex disparities in referrals to electrophysiology or utilization of catheter ablation for newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation, challenging prior observations of lower ablation rates in women.
No sex disparity seen in AF ablation access in this cohort; challenges prior reports yet leaves open questions of generalizability.
Background Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AFCA) is indicated for select patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and has been shown to reduce AF burden and improve quality of life. Earlier studies demonstrated that women are less likely to undergo AFCA despite having more AF symptoms. We investigated whether an association exists between referral patterns and this sex disparity. Methods and Results A retrospective cohort study was conducted of outpatients with newly diagnosed AF using the electronic medical record at Northwestern. Of 5,445 patients analyzed, 2,108 were women, and 3,337 were men. Characteristics including race, insurance status, comorbidities, and prior AF treatment were compared by sex. Logistic regression models adjusted for socioeconomic and clinical factors were constructed to determine associations between sex and binary dependent variables including referrals to and visits with general cardiology and electrophysiology (EP) and utilization of AFCA. There were no significant differences in odds of referral to (aOR, 1.17 [0.92-1.48], P=0.20) or visits with (aOR, 1.03 [0.82-1.30], P=0.79) general cardiologists between women and men. There were no significant differences in odds of referral to (aOR, 0.83 [0.68-1.01], P=0.06) or visits with (aOR, 0.87 [0.72-1.05], P=0.15) electrophysiologists between women and men. Finally, no significant difference was found in likelihood to undergo AFCA between women and men (aOR, 1.08 [0.83-1.40], P=0.56). Conclusions Our study demonstrates no significant differences in referral patterns to specialists or rates of AFCA between women and men. Encouraging equitable referral to specialists and access to AFCA is essential in ensuring appropriate care for all patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gangadharan et al. (2024) conducted a cohort in Atrial fibrillation (n=5,445). Female sex vs. Male sex was evaluated on Utilization of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AFCA) among patients who visited with electrophysiology (aOR 1.08, 95% CI 0.83-1.40, p=0.56). Female sex was not associated with a significant difference in the likelihood of undergoing catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation compared to male sex (aOR 1.08).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: