Key result
During AF, reduced filling time at fast heart rates increases LV peak strain sensitivity to RR-intervals.
Why the study?
The mechanisms determining left ventricular systolic function during atrial fibrillation remain incompletely understood, prompting this evaluation of how changes in RR-interval and LV preload affect LV function.
Observational (n=10)
No
During atrial fibrillation, left ventricular systolic function is highly variable beat-to-beat, particularly at fast heart rates, due to reduced diastolic filling time and changes in preload.
LV strain variability in AF cautions against single-beat assessments at fast rates; leaves open prognostic value and rate-control targets.
AIMS: The irregular atrial electrical activity during atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with a variable left ventricular (LV) systolic function. The mechanisms determining LV function during AF remain incompletely understood. We aimed at elucidating how changes in RR-interval and LV preload affect LV function during AF. METHODS AND RESULTS: Beat-to-beat speckle-tracking echocardiography was performed in 10 persistent AF patients. We evaluated the relation between longitudinal LV peak strain and preceding RR-interval during AF. We used the CircAdapt computational model to evaluate beat-to-beat preload and peak strain during AF for each patient by imposing the patient-specific RR-interval sequences and a non-contractile atrial myocardium. Generic simulations with artificial RR-interval sequences quantified the haemodynamic changes induced by sudden irregular beats. Clinical data and simulations both showed a larger sensitivity of peak strain to changes in preceding RR-interval at slow heart rate (HR) (cycle length, CL <750 ms) than at faster HR. Simulations explained this by a difference in preload of the current beat. Generic simulations confirmed a larger sensitivity of peak strain to preceding RR-interval at fast HR (CL = 600 ms: Δ peak strain = 3.7% vs. 900 ms: Δ peak strain = 0.3%) as in the patients. They suggested that longer LV activation with respect to preceding RR-interval is determinant for this sensitivity. CONCLUSIONS: During AF, longitudinal LV peak strain is highly variable, particularly at fast HR. Beat-to-beat changes in preload explain the differences in LV systolic function. Simulations revealed that a reduced diastolic LV filling time can explain the increased variability at fast HR.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lyon et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Persistent atrial fibrillation (n=10). Speckle-tracking echocardiography and CircAdapt computer simulations was evaluated on Sensitivity of longitudinal left ventricular peak strain to changes in preceding RR-interval. During atrial fibrillation, longitudinal left ventricular peak strain is highly variable and more sensitive to preceding RR-interval changes at fast heart rates due to reduced diastolic filling time.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: