Key result
Prolonged DAPT reduces major events ~46% vs short DAPT in PCI patients with PAD.
Why the study?
Does prolonged dual antiplatelet therapy (24 months) reduce ischemic events compared to short duration (≤6 months) in patients with or without peripheral arterial disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention?
Population
1,970 unselected patients from tertiary care hospitals with stable coronary artery disease or acute coronary…
Comparison
Prolonged dual antiplatelet therapy for 24 months vs Short dual antiplatelet therapy for ≤6 months
Design
RCT, Randomized (subanalysis of the PRODIGY trial)
Authors
Loading...
Supports prolonged DAPT after PCI in patients with PAD; extends prior duration trials to this high-risk subgroup with ischemic benefit.
RCT (n=1,970)
randomized
Yes
Does prolonged dual antiplatelet therapy (24 months) reduce ischemic events compared to short duration (≤6 months) in patients with or without peripheral arterial disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention?
Effect estimate: HR 0.54 (95% CI 0.31-0.95)
Absolute Event Rate: 16.1% vs 27.3%
p-value: p=0.03
Prolonged dual antiplatelet therapy (24 months) significantly reduces ischemic events without increasing bleeding risk in the high-risk subgroup of patients with peripheral arterial disease undergoing PCI.
Franzone et al. (2016) conducted an RCT in stable coronary artery disease or acute coronary syndromes with or without peripheral arterial disease undergoing PCI (n=1,970). Prolonged dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) vs. Short dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) was evaluated on composite of death, myocardial infarction, or cerebrovascular accidents (HR 0.54, 95% CI 0.31-0.95, p=0.03). Prolonged DAPT lowered the risk of death, MI, or cerebrovascular accidents vs short DAPT in PCI patients with PAD (16.1% vs 27.3%; HR 0.54; 95% CI 0.31-0.95; P=0.03).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: