Why the study?
Customary cardiac pacing can inadvertently cause dyssynchrony, motivating the development of new pacing modalities and stimulation sites to achieve individualized physiologic pacing in bradycardia.
This review highlights the evolution of cardiac pacing towards physiologic stimulation to prevent dyssynchrony and improve outcomes in bradycardia and structural heart disease.
Over the years, pacemakers have evolved from a life-saving tool to prevent asystole to a device to treat heart rhythm disorders and heart failure, aiming at improving both cardiac function and clinical outcomes. Cardiac stimulation nowadays aims to correct the electrophysiologic roots of mechanical inefficiency in different structural heart diseases. This has led to awareness of the concealed risks of customary cardiac pacing that can inadvertently cause atrioventricular and inter-/intra-ventricular dyssynchrony, and has promoted the development of new pacing modalities and the use of stimulation sites different from the right atrial appendage and the right ventricular apex. The perspective of truly physiologic pacing is the leading concept of the continued research in the past 30 years, which has made cardiac stimulation procedure more sophisticated and challenging. In this article, we analyze the emerging evidence in favor of the available strategies to achieve an individualized physiologic setting in bradycardia pacing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Biffi et al. (2021) conducted a review in Bradycardia and structural heart diseases. Physiologic pacing strategies vs. Customary cardiac pacing was evaluated.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: