Key result
~84% of HFrEF trials lack clear ischemic etiology definitions, relying primarily on clinical judgment.
Why the study?
How ischemic etiology has been assigned in HFrEF randomized controlled trials was investigated.
Systematic Review (n=169,855)
This meta-analysis highlights that the definition of ischemic etiology in HFrEF trials is largely unstandardized and primarily based on clinical judgment or the presence of prior myocardial infarction.
Inconsistent ischemic etiology definitions may limit HFrEF trial applicability; challenges standardization of patient selection in future RCTs.
AIMS: We investigated how ischemic etiology has been assigned in heart failure with a reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) randomized controlled trials (RCTs). METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of definitions, rates of ischemic etiology and of each ischemic definition component: i) coronary artery disease (CAD), ii) myocardial infarction (MI), iii) coronary revascularization, and iv) prior/current angina. A total of 145 HFrEF RCTs were selected, of which 133 (91.7 %) enrolling both ischemic and non-ischemic patients (629 patients/study on average, median age 64.8 years and ejection fraction 28.2 %). The majority of these RCTs (84.2 %) lacked of clear ischemic etiology definition. Rate of ischemic etiology was 57.8 % (122 RCTs, 169,855 patients), of CAD 53.8 % (25 RCTs, 18,756 patients), of prior MI 46.7 % (57 RCTs, 80,582 patients), of prior revascularization 39.9 % (32 RCTs, 30,730 patients), and of prior/current angina 25.5 % (22 RCTs, 25,572 patients). In studies presenting both variables, prior MI showed the strongest correlations with assigned ischemic etiology (β = 0.84, p < 0.0001, 49 RCTs), followed by prior/current angina (β = 0.84, p < 0.0001, 20 RCTs), prior revascularization (β = 0.30, p = 0.006, 28 RCTs), whereas CAD had no significant correlation (β = 0.29, p = 0.162, from 17 RCTs). Rate of prior MI decreased over time (1986-2007: 51.4 ± 11.6 %; 2008-2016: 48.2 ± 8.8 %; 2017-2023: 41.4 ± 16.6 %; p = 0.057), whereas the one of prior revascularization increased (28.3 ± 11.2 %; 40.7 ± 19.6 %; 49.3 ± 19.4 %; p = 0.048). CONCLUSIONS: An accurate definition of ischemic etiology is mostly lacking in HFrEF RCTs, and primarily assigned based on investigators clinical judgment, sometimes in the presence of a prior MI, although the rate of this component showed a decline over time.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Canepa et al. (2025) conducted a systematic review in Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) (n=169,855). Ischemic etiology definition was evaluated on Rates of ischemic etiology and its components, and their correlation with assigned ischemic etiology. In a meta-analysis of 145 HFrEF RCTs, 84.2% lacked a clear definition of ischemic etiology, which was primarily assigned based on clinical judgment and most strongly correlated with prior MI.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: