Key result
Ischemic, hypertensive, and valvular etiologies link to highest risk in HFrEF, HFmrEF, and HFpEF respectively.
Why the study?
Associations between heart failure etiology and ejection fraction category, as well as the association between etiology and outcomes across EF categories, are poorly studied.
Does heart failure etiology impact outcomes differently across ejection fraction categories in patients with heart failure?
Cohort (n=73,769)
Yes
Does heart failure etiology impact outcomes differently across ejection fraction categories in patients with heart failure?
Ischemic etiology is dominant and associated with worse outcomes in HFrEF, whereas hypertensive and valvular etiologies are more common and associated with worse outcomes in HFmrEF and HFpEF, respectively.
Etiology-specific risks by EF category should not yet change practice; hypothesis-generating for targeted interventions in HFmrEF/HFpEF.
BACKGROUND: The associations between heart failure (HF) etiology and ejection fraction (EF) category and the association between etiology and outcomes in different EF categories are poorly studied. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess differences in etiology and their impact on outcomes in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF), and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). METHODS: Patients enrolled in SwedeHF (Swedish Heart Failure Registry) between April 2010 and December 2023 were included. Patients were categorized according to HF etiology (ischemic, valvular, hypertensive, dilated cardiomyopathy, alcoholic cardiomyopathy, and other) and EF category. The primary outcome was the composite of time to all-cause death and first HF hospitalization. Logistic multinominal regression was used to assess the association between HF etiology and EF category, and Cox regression was used to assess the association between etiology and outcome within each EF category. RESULTS: Among 73,769 patients with HF (53% HFrEF, 25% HFmrEF, and 22% HFpEF; 38% ischemic, 8% valvular, 25% hypertensive, and 29% other), ischemic etiology was independently associated with HFrEF and HFmrEF, while hypertensive and valvular etiologies were associated with HFpEF. In HFrEF, ischemic etiology was associated with the primary outcome in comparison with all other 3 etiologies. In HFmrEF, hypertensive etiology was associated with first HF hospitalization (HR: 1.10 [95% CI: 1.03-1.19]). In HFpEF, valvular etiology was associated with first HF hospitalization (HR: 1.11 [95% CI: 1.02-1.22]). CONCLUSIONS: Ischemic etiology was dominant in HFrEF and HFmrEF, while valvular and hypertensive etiologies dominated in HFpEF. Etiologies most associated with death/HF hospitalization were ischemic in HFrEF, hypertensive in HFmrEF, and valvular in HFpEF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kozman et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Heart failure (n=73,769). Heart failure etiology (ischemic, valvular, hypertensive, etc.) vs. Comparison between different etiologies was evaluated on Composite of time to all-cause death and first HF hospitalization. Ischemic etiology was most associated with death or HF hospitalization in HFrEF, while hypertensive etiology was associated with HF hospitalization in HFmrEF (HR 1.10) and valvular in HFpEF (HR 1.11).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: